SmashWiki:Assume good faith: Difference between revisions

m
m (1 revision: accelerates speed of export if I don't get the history)
Line 26: Line 26:
This policy does not require users to assume good faith when the evidence is obviously to the contrary. When another user is obviously contributing vandalism, [[SW:NPA|personal attacks]], spam, or other policy violations, other contributors who are concerned about the wiki's welfare are free to not assume good faith while dealing with edits that are not made in good faith and while dealing with users who have shown they have not contributed in good faith. However, if an addition to the site has even the slightest chance of being a good faith edit, assume so. If necessary, ask the user who made the questionable edits to clarify their edits on their talk page.
This policy does not require users to assume good faith when the evidence is obviously to the contrary. When another user is obviously contributing vandalism, [[SW:NPA|personal attacks]], spam, or other policy violations, other contributors who are concerned about the wiki's welfare are free to not assume good faith while dealing with edits that are not made in good faith and while dealing with users who have shown they have not contributed in good faith. However, if an addition to the site has even the slightest chance of being a good faith edit, assume so. If necessary, ask the user who made the questionable edits to clarify their edits on their talk page.


{{helpnav}}
[[Category:Administration]]
[[Category:Administration]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Assume good faith}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Assume good faith}}