Forum:Why? Why? Why?: Difference between revisions

no fanon
m (Fixing typoed/wikia redlinks to cut down on WantedPages clutter)
(no fanon)
 
Line 12: Line 12:


I agree with X. I do NOT like the idea of some nobody planing to use our wiki to gain popularity. Along with that, you people are using the though of a person having their own page to bait people in, because you want to be more popular. I never liked Smash Flash, or the crews, or the smasher's articles. IF there is a completely valid reason we have all those things (and don't call video gaming a sport again, please) I would like to hear it. I mean, no sport has 181 teams on it. Major reform is needed here...--[[User:Oxico|Oxico]] ([[User talk:Oxico|talk]]) 10:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree with X. I do NOT like the idea of some nobody planing to use our wiki to gain popularity. Along with that, you people are using the though of a person having their own page to bait people in, because you want to be more popular. I never liked Smash Flash, or the crews, or the smasher's articles. IF there is a completely valid reason we have all those things (and don't call video gaming a sport again, please) I would like to hear it. I mean, no sport has 181 teams on it. Major reform is needed here...--[[User:Oxico|Oxico]] ([[User talk:Oxico|talk]]) 10:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Toomai said that there can't be any fanon on Smashwiki, and articles on fangames like Super Smash Flash "would be deleted without question." Just saying.-[[User:Brawlingbrian|<span style="color:green">Brawlingbrian</span>]][[Image:FalcoHead.png|20px]][[Image:SmashBall.png|20px]] [[User talk:Brawlingbrian|<span style="color:cerulean">LAND</span><span style="color:orange">MASTER!</span>]]
333

edits