Talk:Final Destination (SSBM): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(New Page: this article about the controversy seems very clearly take one side. You're not supposed to. --~~~~)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
this article about the controversy seems very clearly take one side. You're not supposed to. --[[Special:Contributions/65.87.242.28|65.87.242.28]] 15:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
this article about the controversy seems very clearly take one side. You're not supposed to. --[[Special:Contributions/65.87.242.28|65.87.242.28]] 15:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
:You're right, it lists more cons than pros. The problem is, "it's equal and balanced" pretty much sums up the "pro" argument. I've added a cleanup tag to see what can be done, but it seems like the only way to fix it is to shorten the "cons" listed. <span style="color:gray">'''SD706</span>/<span style="color:red">F</span>n<span style="color:blue">W'''</span> -  <small>([[User:Silverdragon706|U]]•[[User talk:Silverdragon706|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|C]] )</small> 01:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)