Forum:Categorizing Special Moves: Difference between revisions

Line 72: Line 72:
:::::I don’t trust ourselves to come up with something practical. Our best bet is to just split them all. That way we can stop these drawn-out arguments on which ones to split and which ones to merge, because they’re all split. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 02:50, May 16, 2019 (EDT)
:::::I don’t trust ourselves to come up with something practical. Our best bet is to just split them all. That way we can stop these drawn-out arguments on which ones to split and which ones to merge, because they’re all split. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 02:50, May 16, 2019 (EDT)
::::::But we need a better basis to split them all than just stopping "''these drawn-out arguments''",  that is is only a part of basis and why we are having this entire topic to categorize the special moves in the first place. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 03:03, May 16, 2019 (EDT)
::::::But we need a better basis to split them all than just stopping "''these drawn-out arguments''",  that is is only a part of basis and why we are having this entire topic to categorize the special moves in the first place. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 03:03, May 16, 2019 (EDT)
:::::::Simply put, there seem to be four main points in the debate: name, origin, functionality and animation. Maybe we can look at them separately, when half of them are different, they are split.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 03:28, May 16, 2019 (EDT)
:::::::Simply put, there seem to be four main points in the debate: name, origin, functionality and animation. Maybe we can look at them separately, when more half of them are different, they are split.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 03:28, May 16, 2019 (EDT)


{{Proposal}}
{{Proposal}}
3,328

edits