Talk:Lucario (SSBB): Difference between revisions

m
.png -> .svg symbol changeover
(I hope I solved the problem here)
m (.png -> .svg symbol changeover)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 133: Line 133:
::Not always --[[User:Murphyshane|Murphyshane]] ([[User talk:Murphyshane|talk]]) 19:35, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
::Not always --[[User:Murphyshane|Murphyshane]] ([[User talk:Murphyshane|talk]]) 19:35, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
:::Guys, they really only have ''similar'' special attacks, and that's about it. Their regular ground attacks are VERY different. Seriously, they aren't clones nor semi-clones, [[Clones#Cross-Gen|they aren't listed as one.]] <span style="font-family:Harlow Solid Italic;">[[User:HavocReaper48|<font color="cyan">Havoc</font>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<font color="navy">Reaper</font>]][[w:c:ssb:User:HavocReaper48/Emoticonology|<span style='color="darkblue"'>48</span>]]</span> 03:09, February 4, 2010 (UTC)
:::Guys, they really only have ''similar'' special attacks, and that's about it. Their regular ground attacks are VERY different. Seriously, they aren't clones nor semi-clones, [[Clones#Cross-Gen|they aren't listed as one.]] <span style="font-family:Harlow Solid Italic;">[[User:HavocReaper48|<font color="cyan">Havoc</font>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<font color="navy">Reaper</font>]][[w:c:ssb:User:HavocReaper48/Emoticonology|<span style='color="darkblue"'>48</span>]]</span> 03:09, February 4, 2010 (UTC)
Hmmm. You've proven your point--[[User:Murphyshane|Murphyshane]] ([[User talk:Murphyshane|talk]]) 21:11, February 4, 2010 (UTC)
The one you are referring to is me. Lucario actually uses a different fighting style similar to a martial arts he developed. Visible differences include palm and foot strikes where as Mewtwo would use his tail. The only thing that would be similar to Mewtwo would be Aura Sphere beacuse it looks the same. His move arsenal may be similar in a fashion with the Aura and Mewtwo would use Darkness, but things that are noticable is that Extremespeed is completely visible and has move of a curvature where as Mewtwo would not be able to be hit, invisible, and is a lot faster. Just compare his entire movset to Lucario's and you should see the significant difference. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Zoa The Guide Of Hell|Zoa The Guide Of Hell]] ([[User talk:Zoa The Guide Of Hell|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zoa The Guide Of Hell|contribs]]) </small>
please sign your comments.[[Special:Contributions/24.12.118.50|24.12.118.50]] 21:49, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
== WHY? ==
LOOK AT THE PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--[[User:Tabuu123|Tabuu123]] ([[User talk:Tabuu123|talk]]) 21:47, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
:We can notice vandalism fine without that kind of talk page comment. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Data Node|Data Node]] 21:51, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
== Caps at 170% ==
Nearly every single move listed on the moveset says that it's damage caps at 170%. There are very few exceptions, and the damage cap is noted at the top of the page. This adds to the redundancy of the page. I am going to reword the moveset, explaining explicity when the damage cap is only when it's a percent other than 170. [[User:MtnDewholic|<font color="red">Mtn</font><font color="green">Dewholic</font>]] [[User talk:MtnDewholic|<font color="teal">9000</font>]][[File:PokemonSymbol.svg|25px]] 21:16, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
:The reason for the redundancy was because it was originally written that each move had is own individual cap, stating wacko things like 167% or 172%. I did a quick runthrough to get rid of the wrong info but didn't have enough time to remove the redundancy. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Eggster 22:31, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
::It's alright, I've rectified the issue. [[User:MtnDewholic|<font color="red">Mtn</font><font color="green">Dewholic</font>]] [[User talk:MtnDewholic|<font color="teal">9000</font>]][[File:PokemonSymbol.svg|25px]] 22:37, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
==I'm quite astounded==
I tested aura-based moves with Lucario at 180% and 5 points behind the current leader. Under these conditions, they inflict even more damage than tourney conditions. I've seen with my own eyes that forward smash inflicts 40-42%, putting King Dedede's f-smash to shame. Up smash can inflict 35%, effectively bearing comparison with the likes of Lucas and Ivysaur's respective up smashes. Down smash can inflict a maximum of 37%. Down aerial could inflict 30% cumulative damage. Forward throw inflicts a whopping 19%! These are just a few examples. I'd propose that this page havee readings edited for better accuracy, but it's quite unlikely that 5 points behind in a match and 180% accumulated damage will occur in a match, espec its damagially in tourneys, no? [[Special:Contributions/97.67.160.226|97.67.160.226]] 11:27, 30 June 2012 (EDT)
:Yes, the numbers on this page need work. The numerical physics of how the lead affects aura are still somewhat unknown. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Spectrum 14:50, 30 June 2012 (EDT)
== Anther ==
Should Anther be in the Notable Players section? [[Special:Contributions/84.92.35.200|84.92.35.200]] 17:15, 18 May 2013 (EDT)
:Did he do significant things with Lucario? Just being a highly notable player that occasionally plays the character is not enough to get listed in the "notable players" section. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 18:57, 18 May 2013 (EDT)
::Probably not, I was just asking, but thanks anyway [[Special:Contributions/84.92.35.200|84.92.35.200]] 09:26, 19 May 2013 (EDT)
== Some misleading information. ==
There appears to be some incorrect information regarding the caps of Lucario's aura based moves at 170%. When highlighting the sections where it shows the aura damages, it gives incorrect information regarding the base damages of moves when at 0% and 170% and tied in stock. Such as when highlighting the fully charged forward smash, it shows 22.4% when sweetspotted and fully charged. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:96.254.172.63|96.254.172.63]] ([[User talk:96.254.172.63|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/96.254.172.63|contribs]]) 16:08, 6 July 2013 (EDT)</small>
:Indeed it is incorrect to note fully-charged smash power like this. I'll fix it. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Celeritous 16:10, 6 July 2013 (EDT)