3,882
edits
Forum:Zeldasmash's new SSBM Tier List: Difference between revisions
→Mewtwo: new section
(→Mewtwo: new section) |
|||
| Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
==Luigi== | ==Luigi== | ||
Um, guys? Can I get an explanation for Luigi at 19?-[[User:Ivy73|<span style="color:forestgreen">Ivy</span>]][[User talk:Ivy73|<span style="color:blue">73</span>]][[Image:002MS.png]] 14:28, July 12, 2010 (UTC) | Um, guys? Can I get an explanation for Luigi at 19?-[[User:Ivy73|<span style="color:forestgreen">Ivy</span>]][[User talk:Ivy73|<span style="color:blue">73</span>]][[Image:002MS.png]] 14:28, July 12, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Mewtwo == | |||
Stop being stupid about this. Mewtwo sucks. Honestly, do you really think that if he was good enough to be tenth on the list people would have stayed away from him this long? You put up one video. And the only time in that video that matters is the final one stock on one stock, as the tier list is for singles. Single one stock match-ups mean ''nothing'' to tiers. A tier list is an aggregate of the play of the character over time. At 10 years since it's release, we can stop going on potential and look at how the character plays. If you two want to think that he is good, fine. But if you want us to treat this as a serious discussion about a serious attempt at a tier list, it's high time you started taking some actual positions on things, and not just link to one video. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 15:00, July 12, 2010 (UTC) | |||