16,361
edits
m (→Smash Direct leak: Wikipedia -> Xeno Series Wiki) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==[[Smash Direct]] leak== | ==[[Smash Direct]] leak== | ||
A few hours before the ''Smash 4''-centered [[Nintendo Direct]] on 8 April 2014, the leaker reportedly sent another email to Romano; the contents of the email continued to claim that Pac-Man and a Mii would still be playable, as well as adding predictions for {{SSB4|Shulk}} from ''{{ | A few hours before the ''Smash 4''-centered [[Nintendo Direct]] on 8 April 2014, the leaker reportedly sent another email to Romano; the contents of the email continued to claim that Pac-Man and a Mii would still be playable, as well as adding predictions for {{SSB4|Shulk}} from ''{{s|xenoserieswiki|Xenoblade Chronicles}}''; {{SSB4|Palutena}} from ''{{S|icaruspedia|Kid Icarus: Uprising}}'' (tying in with [[List of rumors#Palutena rumor|another rumor]]); [[Chrom]] from ''{{s|fireemblemwiki|Fire Emblem Awakening}}''; [[wikipedia:Rhythm Heaven|the Chorus Kids from ''Rhythm Heaven'']] (referred to by their Japanese name of Chorus Men in the leak); and an unknown [[Pokémon]] from ''{{s|bulbapedia|Pokémon X and Y}}'' (referred to as "Pokemon from X/Y" in the leak). | ||
Toward the conclusion of the Nintendo Direct presentation, {{SSB4|Greninja}}, who made its debut in ''Pokémon X and Y'', was revealed as a playable character, along with {{SSB4|Charizard}}. However, this prediction, while technically correct, came under much scrutiny, as a vague blanket prediction was much too general of a guess, and with the popularity of the games, and the prediction's distinction of being the only vague statement in the leak at the time, many observers believed that it was merely a logical deduction, failing to show actual inside information like the E3 2013 leak. | Toward the conclusion of the Nintendo Direct presentation, {{SSB4|Greninja}}, who made its debut in ''Pokémon X and Y'', was revealed as a playable character, along with {{SSB4|Charizard}}. However, this prediction, while technically correct, came under much scrutiny, as a vague blanket prediction was much too general of a guess, and with the popularity of the games, and the prediction's distinction of being the only vague statement in the leak at the time, many observers believed that it was merely a logical deduction, failing to show actual inside information like the E3 2013 leak. |
edits