24,486
edits
User talk:Ac2k: Difference between revisions
m
Removed protection from "User talk:Ac2k": too bad there isn't a way to make exceptions on these for ac2k
(→Spirit of the rule: new section) |
Serpent King (talk | contribs) m (Removed protection from "User talk:Ac2k": too bad there isn't a way to make exceptions on these for ac2k) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:::::::You do realize I am '''NOT''' a staff member, right? [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 16:32, 1 April 2018 (EDT) | :::::::You do realize I am '''NOT''' a staff member, right? [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 16:32, 1 April 2018 (EDT) | ||
::::::::That comment wasn't supposed to be directed at anyone in particular. '''[[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Cardinal 2000</span>]]''' 16:34, 1 April 2018 (EDT) | ::::::::That comment wasn't supposed to be directed at anyone in particular. '''[[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Cardinal 2000</span>]]''' 16:34, 1 April 2018 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::As it currently stands, there is no need to change the rollback policy, because as I have explained multiple times, rollback is to be used for bad faith edits, and deliberate refusal to obey an admin's instructions is bad faith. In fact, insubordination is a blockable offense on any wiki. ''[[User:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: red;">'''Jigglypuff trainer'''</span>]]'' 17:27, 1 April 2018 (EDT) | |||
== Spirit of the rule == | == Spirit of the rule == | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
"If there is any doubt about whether an edit should be rolled back, do not use this feature." | "If there is any doubt about whether an edit should be rolled back, do not use this feature." | ||
How can you justify misuse of rollback as "spirit of the rule" when there is a line in [[SmashWiki:Rollback]] that clearly says otherwise? '''[[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Cardinal 2000</span>]]''' 16:53, 1 April 2018 (EDT) | How can you justify misuse of rollback as "spirit of the rule" when there is a line in [[SmashWiki:Rollback]] that clearly says otherwise? '''[[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Cardinal 2000</span>]]''' 16:53, 1 April 2018 (EDT) | ||
:The spirit of rollback is to easily and quickly get rid of bad edits. The letter of the rule is that it should be limited to obvious vandalism only. As with any rule on the wiki, bending it is probably okay as long as most people agree it's the right move in context. | |||
:That is all that will be said for now. At least seven different users are tired of dealing with your inflexible, can't-let-it-go mentality on the subject. Kindly adjust your attitude by the time you return next month. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Jiggy 17:02, 1 April 2018 (EDT) | |||