860
edits
Talk:Bayonetta: Difference between revisions
Remove irrelevant section in violation of SW:TALK
TheNuttyOne (talk | contribs) (→Human?) |
(Remove irrelevant section in violation of SW:TALK) Tag: Manual revert |
||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Definitely. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="red">SANTY</font> <font color="green">CLAWS</font>]]! Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small> 17:56, 15 December 2015 (EST) | ::Definitely. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="red">SANTY</font> <font color="green">CLAWS</font>]]! Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small> 17:56, 15 December 2015 (EST) | ||
:::They own publishing rights. Its technically PlatinumGames's series, however since Sega published the first entry in the series solo, they co own it. Bayonetta 2 is also partially owned by Nintendo due to them funding the second games development.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 17:57, 15 December 2015 (EST) | :::They own publishing rights. Its technically PlatinumGames's series, however since Sega published the first entry in the series solo, they co own it. Bayonetta 2 is also partially owned by Nintendo due to them funding the second games development.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 17:57, 15 December 2015 (EST) | ||
:::: Yeah she's Sega and Platinum's. Nintendo has some hold over the second Bayonetta game due to them funding it and an agreement with Platinum (which probably resulted in her playable cameo in Wonderful 101), but its still mostly Platinum's.<small> | :::: Yeah she's Sega and Platinum's. Nintendo has some hold over the second Bayonetta game due to them funding it and an agreement with Platinum (which probably resulted in her playable cameo in Wonderful 101), but its still mostly Platinum's. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:SilverSupernova|SilverSupernova]] ([[User talk:SilverSupernova|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SilverSupernova|contribs]]) 10:27, 15 December 2015</small> | ||
:::::Here's the basic gist: SEGA owns the IP, Platinum owns the development. [[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: red;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: green;">'''the Jolly Space Warrior'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig2.png|20px]] 10:31, 17 December 2015 (EST) | :::::Here's the basic gist: SEGA owns the IP, Platinum owns the development. [[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: red;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: green;">'''the Jolly Space Warrior'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig2.png|20px]] 10:31, 17 December 2015 (EST) | ||
::::::So its like SE's Relationship with disney in regards to the KH series, right. I dunno the fact that Sega nearly ended the series simply because they didn't want to fund it, and then goes around to work on the Sonic boom series, really irks me. I really wish Nintendo would buy the IP from Sega.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 03:00, 19 December 2015 (EST) | ::::::So its like SE's Relationship with disney in regards to the KH series, right. I dunno the fact that Sega nearly ended the series simply because they didn't want to fund it, and then goes around to work on the Sonic boom series, really irks me. I really wish Nintendo would buy the IP from Sega.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 03:00, 19 December 2015 (EST) | ||
Sorry to bring back a dead topic, but this was pointed out on GameFAQ's and I wanted to bring it to your attention. According to the [http://www.smashbros.com/us/dlc/index.html official DLC site for smash Bros.] Most characters are usually listed being copyright their companies owners. IE Ryu is copyright Capcom, and cloud is copyright SE. But for Bayonetta it says copyright Nintendo and Sega. Does this sort of make her a Second Party character, like Shulk, or does this keep her purely third party?<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 01:47, 31 January 2016 (EST) | |||
:My theory is that it's a case of Sega owning the IP and Nintendo owning some of the rights to the Bayonetta 2-specific elements, like Bayonetta's new design. I'd say the character still counts as 3rd party, though, since Sega isn't a subsidiary the way Intelligent Systems and Monolith Soft are. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 01:49, 31 January 2016 (EST) | |||
::Ahh, alrighty I just wanted to make sure before making any edits. Feb 3rd cant get here sooner 👄✨💖<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 01:59, 31 January 2016 (EST) | |||
==Human?== | ==Human?== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 25: | ||
::::::: what part of "''Bayonetta is even called human many times by the angels and demons she fights.''" do you not understand?<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 21:21, 3 January 2016 (EST) | ::::::: what part of "''Bayonetta is even called human many times by the angels and demons she fights.''" do you not understand?<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 21:21, 3 January 2016 (EST) | ||
::::::::crap sorry I somehow skimmed past that part. Carry on <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small> 21:24, 3 January 2016 (EST) | ::::::::crap sorry I somehow skimmed past that part. Carry on <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small> 21:24, 3 January 2016 (EST) | ||
== Infernal Climax Trophy == | |||
I noticed in the SSB4 section there's an image of the Infernal Climax trophy. However, I noticed that (after checking 3-5 more character pages) no other character has their Final Smash Trophy shown. Is there a specific reason for Bayonetta's, or should we just remove it? [[User:AmoongussForLife|<span style="color:green">AmoongussForLife</span>]] [[File:AmoongussForLife's_signature.png]][[User_talk:AmoongussForLife|<span style="color:purple">Talk</span>]] 14:30, 12 March 2016 (EST) | |||
I think they're supposed to have an image. Why not type this in? <nowiki>{{image|Trophy}}</nowiki> [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 14:33, 12 March 2016 (EST) | |||
:Probably shouldn't be there. Feel free to remove other Final Smash trophies from general character pages like this. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 14:34, 12 March 2016 (EST) | |||
Huh? Why not? I personally like them there, especially since I don't intend to complete All-Star Mode with every single character. [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 14:39, 12 March 2016 (EST) | |||
::It was removed for the sake of consistency, but each character could have them consistently on their page as it does pertain to the character and it would be nice to see them on the character page. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 14:41, 12 March 2016 (EST) | |||
:::It's not a trophy "of Bayonetta", it's a trophy of the Final Smash itself (and is already included on the [[Infernal Climax]] page). I'm not really sure why it's needed here. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 14:45, 12 March 2016 (EST) | |||
::::It's no need, but neither are the other trophies. It depicts her performing one of her moves in Smash like her Alt trophies, that goes for all the characters. I don't care much either way as it's all a click away, but I just brought it up as a suggestion. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 15:01, 12 March 2016 (EST) | |||
== [[:Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls|Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls category]] == | |||
what is with this annoying category, and how on earth do you get rid of it?<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 06:59, 10 July 2016 (EDT) | |||
== Obscurity == | |||
On Bayonetta's page, I think we should address that she is an obscure character. [[User:Kaithehedgefox|Kaithehedgefox]] ([[User talk:Kaithehedgefox|talk]]) 21:40, March 6, 2021 (EST) | |||
:It's not really appropriate for us to call anything obscure (and Bayonetta really isn't anyway). [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 21:49, March 6, 2021 (EST) | |||
:2 million copies sold across Bayo 1 & 2 isn't that obscure. ''NieR: Automata'' PlatinumGames' best seller and the talk of 2017 sold 5 million, ''only'' 2.5 times more than Bayo. --[[User:CanvasK|CanvasK]] ([[User talk:CanvasK|talk]]) 21:50, March 6, 2021 (EST) | |||