SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Disaster Flare (2)

That link BeepYou posted at the bottom in comments is triggering my anti-virus software.Edit

Thought I should say something. Unowninator (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2016 (EST)

It's probably trigger-happy virus software. Anti-virus software can be like that sometimes. I didn't get any triggers from it and I go on deviantart a lot so. Disaster Flare

(talk) 19:33, 4 March 2016 (EST)

Confirmed 100% clean. Serpent King 22:35, 4 March 2016 (EST)

^ How did you do that? And what's your software, if you don't mind me asking? Unowninator (talk) 22:38, 4 March 2016 (EST)

It's just an image of Sans from Undertale saying "I'm rootin' for ya, kid". Nothing that could mean bad faith. --

BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2016 (EST)

My software is Avast. And how did I do what? Serpent King 22:43, 4 March 2016 (EST)

Confirm it 100% if my software doesn't trust it. Unowninator (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2016 (EST)

Different software can have different false positive triggers. Disaster Flare

(talk) 22:46, 4 March 2016 (EST)

This is complete bullshit why can't I have a vote?!Edit

I deserve a say!

PS I didn't even know I was banned until someone told me, so I won't say anymore after this unless asked something 70.214.70.54 18:53, 12 March 2016 (EST)

You deserve a say. I'd hate to be that guy, but honestly, is this really worth the blocks and reverts? He's not spamming the vote page. He's multi-reverting things, but you never really addressed his question. If he votes and hates on Disaster Flare, why would it matter? RfA's aren't a popularity vote. Toomai's not going to exactly be too disturbed that one random IP decided to vote against Disaster because of a stupid reason. Mega Tron1 XD 20:11, 12 March 2016 (EST)

Did you even read the vote? Penro

20:13, 12 March 2016 (EST)

Alright, let's just copy-paste it, word for word.

"Strongly oppose: he got me blocked. If you love me, you'll deny this request "

Wow. Amazing. Very strong vote. I'm sure it'll matter. The vote isn't going to mean anything, but I don't see how starting a shit show over a vote that won't even affect the RfA is considered as the most valid and legit solution to dealing with an ip (~~vandal~~). Mega Tron1 XD 20:16, 12 March 2016 (EST)

Since it simply doesn't get through your head, let me say it again. Did you read the vote? That clearly infers that he may have been a vandal previously, and it's disruptive. It's spam, which we revert. Penro

20:20, 12 March 2016 (EST)

Unless, of course, this is your IP, as I heard you have been known to create IP proxies. Not that I think that, just a thought. Penro

20:22, 12 March 2016 (EST)

Woah dude, you can't just confront someone like that without evidence. Disaster Flare

(talk) 20:23, 12 March 2016 (EST)

Yeah, probably shouldn't have done that. Yet another conflict with you and I... *sigh*. Penro

20:25, 12 March 2016 (EST)

As legit as this as your view is, the way I see it, the content doesn't matter in this situation. You're pursuing a zero tolerance policy when you could have answered the IP or let the vote stay. You would rather resort to getting the page protected and banning the IP all because "it's spam, we gotta ban him!" instead of just giving him/her what he/she wants because of this. Regardless, the IP's done, so this entire conversation is pretty much done. Mega Tron1 XD 20:28, 12 March 2016 (EST)

If you vote in a ballot for a candidate because you have a grudge against the other, is that not still a vote? Cool off a bit on this one. His vote isn't big in the grand scheme of things, and here at SW it's not all based on the numbers but approval from higher-ups as well. They can discern a serious, legitimate vote from one that is not. MuteSpittah (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2016 (EST)

i personnaly think he is a vandal (Who the heck do you actually think this guy is? I NEED TO KNOW NOW!)

Poultry

(talk) the Pumpkin Pie 20:40, 12 March 2016 (EST)

If the IP has abstained, this is EOD. Serpent King 20:45, 12 March 2016 (EST)