2,594
edits
SSB Code of Conduct Panel: Difference between revisions
m
Just need to add references and this page is done.
No edit summary |
m (Just need to add references and this page is done.) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|April 12th, 2020||{{Sm|Overtriforce}}||Sexual harassment||Lifetime ban||[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1249347445731057665 Public Statement]<br>[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1reHw_N8hrdsGa6s5lVQ1MyLkX6dNGuKZvtqcQQgFwvs/edit Case]||Investigation performed by UK Melee Backroom. | |April 12th, 2020||{{Sm|Overtriforce}}||Sexual harassment||Lifetime ban||[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1249347445731057665 Public Statement]<br>[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1reHw_N8hrdsGa6s5lVQ1MyLkX6dNGuKZvtqcQQgFwvs/edit Case]||Investigation performed by UK Melee Backroom. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|April 2020||Hoover||Level 3/4 offenses||Indefinite ban||[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1261047371582111747/photo/1 Public Statement]||Chance for appeal after 5 years. | |April 2020||Hoover||{{rollover|Level 3/4 offenses|Offenses not publicly known|y}}||Indefinite ban||[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel/status/1261047371582111747/photo/1 Public Statement]||Chance for appeal after 5 years. | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Controversy== | ==Controversy== | ||
=== | ===Mafia case=== | ||
In early 2019, the panel was the center of controversy when it decided to recommend the unbanning of {{Sm|Mafia}}, who had involved in a sexual harassment case. The panel supported this recommendation by stating that Mafia had shown major signs of improvement through the use of therapy and many self-directed efforts to better himself. The majority of the community aware of the situation expressed their disapproval of the decision and many tournament organizers ignored the recommendation. The panel was unanimously criticized for allowing someone who had perpetrated an act of sexual harassment back into the community. As a result of this, an appeal was made by 23 tournament organizers who had applied to the panel's signatory list. The final verdict was not publicized, however, he has remained banned in most if not all regions. | In early 2019, the panel was the center of controversy when it decided to recommend the unbanning of {{Sm|Mafia}}, who had involved in a sexual harassment case. The panel supported this recommendation by stating that Mafia had shown major signs of improvement through the use of therapy and many self-directed efforts to better himself. The majority of the community aware of the situation expressed their disapproval of the decision and many tournament organizers ignored the recommendation. The panel was unanimously criticized for allowing someone who had perpetrated an act of sexual harassment back into the community. As a result of this, an appeal was made by 23 tournament organizers who had applied to the panel's signatory list. The final verdict was not publicized, however, he has remained banned in most if not all regions. | ||
===Mew2Queen and CaptainZack case=== | |||
In January of 2020, the panel would once again be the center of controversy due to the nature of the bans involving CaptainZack and Mew2Queen. CaptainZack, who was involved in a match fixing incident and given an indefinite ban, was allowed to submit an appeal after 5 years while Mew2Queen, who was involved in a sexual harassment case and also indefinitely banned, was allowed an appeal after only 2.5. The community criticized the panel for issuing a shorter ban period to someone who who perpetrated an act of sexual harassment, which has considerably greater ramifications than match fixing. In a Twitter thread produced by Enzo, it was explained that Zack's 5 year ban period was the result of convincing privately-shared evidence as well as following common protocol for match fixing in other competitive environments. Enzo expressed that he had advocated for a one year ban period, but was ultimately not successful. On January 18th, it was announced that any person found to have committed any form of sexual harassment would be issued a lifetime ban. This would retroactively apply to Mew2Queen. | In January of 2020, the panel would once again be the center of controversy due to the nature of the bans involving CaptainZack and Mew2Queen. CaptainZack, who was involved in a match fixing incident and given an indefinite ban, was allowed to submit an appeal after 5 years while Mew2Queen, who was involved in a sexual harassment case and also indefinitely banned, was allowed an appeal after only 2.5. The community criticized the panel for issuing a shorter ban period to someone who who perpetrated an act of sexual harassment, which has considerably greater ramifications than match fixing. In a Twitter thread produced by Enzo, it was explained that Zack's 5 year ban period was the result of convincing privately-shared evidence as well as following common protocol for match fixing in other competitive environments. Enzo expressed that he had advocated for a one year ban period, but was ultimately not successful. On January 18th, it was announced that any person found to have committed any form of sexual harassment would be issued a lifetime ban. This would retroactively apply to Mew2Queen. | ||
In late June of 2020, growing sentiments would eventually evolve into a Twitter campaign advocating for CaptainZack's unbanning. This would spread in the form of the hashtag "UnbanCaptainZack". People supportive of the movement argued that CaptainZack's ban period was unjustifiably long. On June 28th, 2020, the Conduct Panel defended the ban by making a statement claiming that information, dynamics, and patterns of behavior that cannot be publicly shared led to the verdict. | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel Twitter] | *[https://twitter.com/SSBConductPanel Twitter] | ||