3,882
edits
MediaWiki talk:Edittools: Difference between revisions
→Improvements
m (→Improvements: formatting) |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
'''Oppose''' but only for removing the nuked template. Here's the thing. The nuked template is handy whenever you get something that's not worthy of debate but should merely be silenced undemocratically. It has immense power, and is frankly part of the culture and history of this wiki, a part of our history that we should hold on to and encourage practiced users to employ when necessary. If the opportunity arises, I will gladly demonstrate both the utility and the enormous satisfaction one gets when using it. It is also useful when you want to give somebody an example of what ''not'' to do, which is useful to the community as a whole, who get a wholesale example of what is not acceptable on this wiki. It does so in an unambiguous and salient way. Therefore, I oppose the removal of the nuked tag in the revised version of the editbox. Thanks you, ladies and gentlemen. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 22:49, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | '''Oppose''' but only for removing the nuked template. Here's the thing. The nuked template is handy whenever you get something that's not worthy of debate but should merely be silenced undemocratically. It has immense power, and is frankly part of the culture and history of this wiki, a part of our history that we should hold on to and encourage practiced users to employ when necessary. If the opportunity arises, I will gladly demonstrate both the utility and the enormous satisfaction one gets when using it. It is also useful when you want to give somebody an example of what ''not'' to do, which is useful to the community as a whole, who get a wholesale example of what is not acceptable on this wiki. It does so in an unambiguous and salient way. Therefore, I oppose the removal of the nuked tag in the revised version of the editbox. Thanks you, ladies and gentlemen. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 22:49, 20 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
:Courier New is ugly as piss, and Arial is no better. Garamond or GTFO—Garamond or I nuke the edit tools. You feel me, G-rida. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 22:15, 21 October 2012 (EDT) | |||