Forum:The Tier List/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Line 669: Line 669:


:This list is just showing who is easier to master in my opinion. My friend uses Meta Knight after about two days of trying him, and I win all the time when fighting it. My other friend spent his entire time playing as Captain Falcon, and I can NEVER win against him...That jerk. '''[[User:Cafinator|<span style="color:Darkorange"><small><small>CAFINATOR</small></small></span>]]''' [[User talk:Cafinator|<span style="color:brown"><small><sup>''Indeed''</sup></small></span>]] 02:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
:This list is just showing who is easier to master in my opinion. My friend uses Meta Knight after about two days of trying him, and I win all the time when fighting it. My other friend spent his entire time playing as Captain Falcon, and I can NEVER win against him...That jerk. '''[[User:Cafinator|<span style="color:Darkorange"><small><small>CAFINATOR</small></small></span>]]''' [[User talk:Cafinator|<span style="color:brown"><small><sup>''Indeed''</sup></small></span>]] 02:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
::I disagree. The tier list measures the character's overall potential. And most of the top tier characters are not easy to master. Look at Snake, for instance. The list is based on 3 "things":
*1. The character's tourney results;
*2. The character's match-ups; `
*3. The characters potential, in other words, advantages and disadvatages, advanced techniques, etc.
It's not just a random list. Meta Knight is 1st because many people won LOTS of tourneys with him and his matchups are amazing. And he has a technique similar to Jiggs WoP in Melee. [[User:Xeze|Xeze]] ([[User talk:Xeze|talk]]) 02:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Anonymous user