User:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers: Difference between revisions

m (Reverted 75.143.177.188: Not an argument)
Line 81: Line 81:


The fifth argument, called the recursive argument, is invalid because it does not account for the large variation among professionals. At least for Melee, while the tiers were in place, professionals still played their best medium, and not always who was top tier.  Some players are dedicated low tier professionals.  Still, through all this, the clear majority of tournament victories in Melee went to Fox/Falco, Marth and Sheik. The recursive argument may in fact have some validity but its reach is insufficient to disprove the existence of tiers, it merely says that the existence of a tier list affects metagame, leaving unproved the follow up that characters are balanced and the tier list corrupts that balance.  Indeed, to derive such an assumption from the argument would be a fallacy.
The fifth argument, called the recursive argument, is invalid because it does not account for the large variation among professionals. At least for Melee, while the tiers were in place, professionals still played their best medium, and not always who was top tier.  Some players are dedicated low tier professionals.  Still, through all this, the clear majority of tournament victories in Melee went to Fox/Falco, Marth and Sheik. The recursive argument may in fact have some validity but its reach is insufficient to disprove the existence of tiers, it merely says that the existence of a tier list affects metagame, leaving unproved the follow up that characters are balanced and the tier list corrupts that balance.  Indeed, to derive such an assumption from the argument would be a fallacy.
Well this isn't biased at all.


==Normative arguments==
==Normative arguments==
Anonymous user