Talk:Clone/Archive 6: Difference between revisions

Talk:Clone/Archive 6 (view source)

896 bytes added , 5 years ago

2,594

edits

@@ Line 186: / Line 186: @@
 :::::::::Let’s not complicate matters. This was only meant to argue Ganondorf’s, Pichu’s, and Young Link’s status, not to create some “semi-echo” status. Frankly, this comments section wasn’t even supposed to exist. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 19:11, March 14, 2019 (EDT)
 ::::::::::And I think you won't find and agreement because you don't all have the same idea about what a clone is supposed to be, that's an issue ;) [[User:YoshiRyu|YoshiRyu]] ([[User talk:YoshiRyu|talk]]) 20:13, March 14, 2019 (EDT)
+:::::::::::The issue isn’t what subtypes of clones there are though. The issue is if judging them strictly off of their moves’ animations is really the best choice. Because there are certain characters who have many moves with similar animations, but completely different non-attack animations, and are way too different from other characters in their category to justifiably be in the same position as said characters. Ganondorf is comparable to Luigi, and Young Link is comparable to Falco. I’m not sure if there’s any good way to put what I’m trying to communicate here, but he psudeo-clone disticntion is fine as it is. It’s only Ganondorf, Young Link, and''maybe'' Pichu I have problems with, so there’s no need to make a “semi-echo” distinction. That would be unneccesarily complicated. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 15:29, March 16, 2019 (EDT)