User:Tepig/Feedback: Difference between revisions

(Go ahead and comment you all!)
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
== What am I doing right? ==
== What am I doing right? ==
If you wanna give me a compliment, put it here! (I know I deserve it :P)
If you wanna give me a compliment, put it here! (I know I deserve it :P)
#You're active and hardworking. It's amazing how many edits I would've made had you not already made them! [[User:BaconMaster331|<span style="color: Crimson;">'''Bacon'''</span>]][[User talk:BaconMaster331|<span style="color: Maroon;">'''Master'''</span>]][[File:BaconMasterSig.png]] 20:18, 6 February 2016 (EST)
#Keep up the good work, and I would try for Rollback if I were you :P <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:12pt">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">'''Serpent'''</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;">'''King'''</span></span>]] 18:10, 7 February 2016 (EST)


== What am I dong wrong? ==
== What am I dong wrong? ==
If you wanna give me '''constructive''' criticism, put it here.
If you wanna give me '''constructive''' criticism, put it here.
#
== Comments ==
Thanks guys! As for trying for rollback, it is funny you mention it now, 'cause I recently considered trying. But the page [[SmashWiki:Requests for rollback]] says to provide 3 examples of "your edits that you believe could have been uses of rollback", and I don't know what to put there. I assume you need to put links to things such as vandalism reverts? 'Cause I've never done that, like, ever. (I have seen vandalism a few times and tried to revert it, but someone always beats me to it). Can I put other things in there? Should I try without doing that anyways? [[File:TepigSprite.png]][[User:Tepig|Tepig]] ([[User talk:Tepig|talk]]) 20:51, 7 February 2016 (EST)
:No, that's the entire basis behind accepting or failing an RfR: Toomai looks at your reverts and decides if the qualify as valid uses of RB, (so vandalism). My suggestion is just be vigilant and mark down URLs for any vandal-reverting you do do (get the diff url). <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:12pt">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">'''Serpent'''</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;">'''King'''</span></span>]] 00:33, 8 February 2016 (EST)
::That makes sense. I'll be on the lookout then! [[File:TepigSprite.png]][[User:Tepig|Tepig]] ([[User talk:Tepig|talk]]) 17:38, 8 February 2016 (EST)

Latest revision as of 18:38, February 8, 2016

I've seen a few similiar pages for oher users around here, so why not create one for me? Remember to sign your comments.

What am I doing right?Edit

If you wanna give me a compliment, put it here! (I know I deserve it :P)

  1. You're active and hardworking. It's amazing how many edits I would've made had you not already made them! BaconMaster  20:18, 6 February 2016 (EST)
  2. Keep up the good work, and I would try for Rollback if I were you :P Serpent   King 18:10, 7 February 2016 (EST)

What am I dong wrong?Edit

If you wanna give me constructive criticism, put it here.

CommentsEdit

Thanks guys! As for trying for rollback, it is funny you mention it now, 'cause I recently considered trying. But the page SmashWiki:Requests for rollback says to provide 3 examples of "your edits that you believe could have been uses of rollback", and I don't know what to put there. I assume you need to put links to things such as vandalism reverts? 'Cause I've never done that, like, ever. (I have seen vandalism a few times and tried to revert it, but someone always beats me to it). Can I put other things in there? Should I try without doing that anyways?  Tepig (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2016 (EST)

No, that's the entire basis behind accepting or failing an RfR: Toomai looks at your reverts and decides if the qualify as valid uses of RB, (so vandalism). My suggestion is just be vigilant and mark down URLs for any vandal-reverting you do do (get the diff url). Serpent   King 00:33, 8 February 2016 (EST)
That makes sense. I'll be on the lookout then!  Tepig (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2016 (EST)