7,049
edits
Talk:Mercenaries of the Dark Hunter: Difference between revisions
m
redlink
m (adding archive template, change it if there's a more appropriate template) |
m (redlink) |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:''The wiki pages for clubs before weren't being banned, but after the Ridley incident they're all being makred for deletion.'' | :''The wiki pages for clubs before weren't being banned, but after the Ridley incident they're all being makred for deletion.'' | ||
:Seeing as how I joined just shortly before that whole ridiculous incident, I can't really speak on the community's views on character support group articles. I was virtually unaware of their existence up until that point. From what I've seen, I will admit that editors here generally didn't mind these articles. In fact, in most cases, they were against deleting them. I personally never understood why some random internet forum alliance offering support for a character was somehow notable enough for an article and I took the opportunity to express my opinions when that Ridley incident unfolded (as you can see | :Seeing as how I joined just shortly before that whole ridiculous incident, I can't really speak on the community's views on character support group articles. I was virtually unaware of their existence up until that point. From what I've seen, I will admit that editors here generally didn't mind these articles. In fact, in most cases, they were against deleting them. I personally never understood why some random internet forum alliance offering support for a character was somehow notable enough for an article and I took the opportunity to express my opinions when that Ridley incident unfolded (as you can see Talk:R.I.D.L.E.Y.|here). Apparently, it turns out that others felt the same way and took the initiative to mark other such entries for deletion; obviously, at least one of the sysops here also agreed, seeing as how every one of those articles was eventually removed. | ||
:What caused this change in stance on alliance articles? I couldn't tell you; for what it's worth, more than likely it is due to the Ridley incident. Whatever the case, that doesn't matter; those articles were deemed acceptable in the past and that is obviously no longer the case - oh, well. | :What caused this change in stance on alliance articles? I couldn't tell you; for what it's worth, more than likely it is due to the Ridley incident. Whatever the case, that doesn't matter; those articles were deemed acceptable in the past and that is obviously no longer the case - oh, well. | ||