Forum:Banning Characters: Difference between revisions
→Meh
(→Meh) |
(→Meh) |
||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
::@Paradox Juice: Well, what I as a tournament organizer have to say is said above. The criteria used to determine banning don't lead to banning characters. | ::@Paradox Juice: Well, what I as a tournament organizer have to say is said above. The criteria used to determine banning don't lead to banning characters. | ||
::@Toomai: I don't give a damn what Nintendo intended. I paid $50 for SSBB and I will play it however I want. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 01:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | ::@Toomai: I don't give a damn what Nintendo intended. I paid $50 for SSBB and I will play it however I want. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 01:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Think of this. To your opponent, you ARE the most random factor in the game. They can almost never tell what you are thinking of doing. Wavedashing is random. Items are random, but everyone knows that there is a CHANCE of items appearing next to them. Just because there is randomness in a match doesn't mean your helpless against it. Some one throws a bomb at you! Are you doomed? No. Instead you catch it in mid-air and throw it back at your taunting opponent. If you were him, would you think it was random? Possibly... Would you have ever seen it coming? Probrably not... But the chance of your opponent doing that IS random! So why don't they ban people for doing unexpected things? Its random isn't it? Oh yes, randomness is frowned upon most standard tornaments. (Don't care if you do so don't say.) [[User:Learner4|Learner4]] ([[User talk:Learner4|talk]]) 01:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | |||