Talk:Mercenaries of the Dark Hunter: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 61: Line 61:
You JUST changed your arguement to why this should be deleted when it was established that these alliances were only being removed after the Ridley incident. By the way, I have to correct myself. An '''Admin''' said that in a question and answer thing here, that this place and SmashBoards are not to be affiliated in things like events and bans.  
You JUST changed your arguement to why this should be deleted when it was established that these alliances were only being removed after the Ridley incident. By the way, I have to correct myself. An '''Admin''' said that in a question and answer thing here, that this place and SmashBoards are not to be affiliated in things like events and bans.  


Besides, for all you know we all could of went in a few Melee tourneys The only real reason this was marked for deletion was because it looked like a character alliance, even though really a group of tourneygoers who happened to like Dark Samus.
Besides, for all you know we all could of went in a few Melee tourneys The only real reason this was marked for deletion was because it looked like a character alliance, even though really a group of tourneygoers who happened to like Dark Samus. {{unsigned|Biggie smalls}}
 
:''You JUST changed your arguement to why this should be deleted when it was established that these alliances were only being removed after the Ridley incident.''
 
:What in the hell are you talking about?  My entire argument for this article's deletion has been: a) it's not Wiki-worthy material as you're not a competitive crew and b) it's unfair to allow this to remain when other alliance articles were deleted.  I didn't change anything - reread my last two responses for proof (I might as well be asking you to fly).
 
If anything, the only one who has continued to back up and change their poor arguments is yourself; you initially claimed that it'd be a violation of your rights for this article to be deleted.  Seeing that didn't work as how that free speech amendment you know so much about doesn't apply to a privately-owned entity (this website), you then tried suggesting that the article shouldn't be deleted because you may ''possibly'' play competitively in the future and that the mods are hypocrites (for whatever reason).  Seeing that argument also fail (and realizing that the mods on SWF =/= the sysops here), you're now trying to make it seem as if you're already a competitive crew, which is completely contrary to what you've said up to this point.
 
And for goodness sakes, '''sign your comments'''.
 
:''By the way, I have to correct myself. An '''Admin''' said that in a question and answer thing here, that this place and SmashBoards are not to be affiliated in things like events and bans.''
 
:While I have to question the veracity of that claim (honestly, I think that's BS and you just decided to say that after realizing that what an admin declares will always overrule what a mod declares), I'd like to see a link.  Either way, that's not going to change my point - unless the admin who supposedly said that is on [[Special:Listadmins|this list]], '''they're wrong'''.
 
:''Besides, for all you know we all could of went in a few Melee tourneys.''
 
:That's obviously untrue as you've already admitted that this group not yet played competitively.  Don't bother with the ridiculous hypotheticals, please.
 
:''The only real reason this was marked for deletion was because it looked like a character alliance, even though really a group of tourneygoers who happened to like Dark Samus.''
 
:No, it's marked for deletion because it ''is'' a character alliance - it is '''not''' a crew and don't even attempt to suggest that it is, as you yourself have stated otherwise. &ndash; [[User:EPX2|<b><i>EP</i></b>]] <small>([[User talk:EPX2|Talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/EPX2|Edits]])</small> 06:30, December 21, 2007 (EST)
Anonymous user