Forum:Character articles protection list: Difference between revisions

#<s>'''Full support'''</s><nowiki>*</nowiki>. The SSBU pages are edited by IPs pretty much on a daily basis, and they keep worsening the quality of the article (particularly the changelists) by either repeatedly adding misinformation, worsening their readability by bloating up paragraphs with information that is already organized properly, or putting their bias in those articles by either sugarcoating or exaggerating the characters' flaws ([https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Donkey_Kong_(SSBU)&action=history here's an example of such]). At this point, it's getting tiring to have other users constantly revert them. If you look at most SSBU character pages' edit histories, particularly [https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Kirby_(SSBU)&action=history Kirby], [https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Zelda_(SSBU)&action=history Zelda], and [https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Mario_(SSBU)&action=history Mario], these IPs seem to follow a constant pattern (edit change sections, do any of those three aforementioned actions), even after every revert, and don't leave these pages alone; in the former two, the edit warring got so bad that they have been already protected multiple times, and ever since, they have mantained a much more consistent quality. There seems to be an IP in particular that keeps changing their IP number and range, and goes specifically to SSBU pages to submit these unconstructive edits, seemingly never listening to anyone else even after [https://www.ssbwiki.com/User_talk:176.201.37.199 I've tried] [https://www.ssbwiki.com/User_talk:176.201.42.231 to contact them], and also [https://www.ssbwiki.com/Talk:Kirby_(SSBU) insisting on having their way] after the pages in question get protected. Then there's [https://www.ssbwiki.com/Special:Contributions/47.204.61.237 another IP] that keeps tampering with the update history changelogs, likewise worsening their redaction and even [https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=King_K._Rool_(SSBU)&diff=prev&oldid=1317921 removing a large chunk of information in the process].<br><br>It's really hard to keep track of the specific users, which is what would be done in other cases (Toomai even did a range block once, and that didn't help at all), and I think these SSBU pages need a lot of quality checking; they're currently among our most relevant pages, people constantly gather information about the game (it's also been [https://rubendal.github.io/ssbu/#/Character datamined for months] now), and the changelists entail detailed and technical information that few users understand properly (much less casual editors without accounts), so allowing misinformation in these pages to still be repeatedly added on the fly is very detrimental. I firmly believe this proposal would improve the wiki.<br><br>Also, for the record, I agree with this specifically in regards to the changelists (Changes from SSB4 and update history). I don't think it's ''too'' necessary for moveset subpages either (though they fall under a similar category). I would prefer to still keep other parts of the pages edit-able, since there's not nearly as much trouble there, but the wiki doesn't have per-section protection, and I don't know if such thing can be achieved. [[File:034.png|20px]] '''<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:DracoRexKing|<font color="red">DracoRex,]]</font> [[User talk:DracoRexKing|<font color="olive">Creator of the Land]]</font></span>''' 10:26, December 17, 2019 (EST)<br><br><nowiki>*</nowiki>EDIT: Seeing SK's proposal to move the changelists to templates, I think this would be a better idea to keep them restricted to autoconfirmed users without protecting the rest of the pages' content (since then you can just protect the templates) . I still support the proposal in spirit, but I'd take this new solution instead of a full protection of the pages.<small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:DracoRexKing|DracoRexKing]] ([[User talk:DracoRexKing|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DracoRexKing|contribs]]) 10:48, December 17, 2019 (EST)</small>

#'''Strong support (template)''': I was also originally in support of protecting the pages, but I like SK's idea of putting the changelists to templates that are auto protected (though, tbh, I think established protection would be better but auto confirmed is better than nothing). I don't have much else to add that Draco hasn't already said other than I have personally seen the effect of allowing IPs to tamper with vital information as the wiki is frequently scoffed amongst competitive circles due to frequent false information being added, which only  makes people lose a lot of trust in us as a reliable source of information. Data that is objective (i.e. information with zero room for debate and not up for opinions, such as data that is pulled directly from the game that can be easily proof checked) should be protected from overzealous, opinionated people for the sake of our integrity if we want to be a reliable source of information for the competitive scene. '''[[User:Voqéo|<span style="background:#000; color:white; padding:2px 6px;font-size:12px;">Voqéo</span>]][[User talk:Voqéo|<span style="background:#e70012; color:white; padding:2px 4px;font-size:12px;">T</span>]]''' 11:53, December 17, 2019 (EST)

#'''Support, but for the template'''. It'd be much easier to control (for lack of a better word) the information specifically regarding a character's attributes and technical data if it was put aside as a linked template, and ''that'' were protected. That way, only the specific section of information can be taken care of, and we don't have to worry about any complete and utter shutdown of editing. I was never in on the idea of outright forbidding IPs from editing, but I also think that something has to be done. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: red;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: green;">'''the Festive Rurouni'''</span>]] 12:48, December 17, 2019 (EST)

#'''Support the template'''. Not much to say that hasn't been said above. Although I would love full protection for character articles, IPs have helped write many parts of the articles. Furthermore, the issue here mostly lies in the attributes and technical data, so I believe template proposal would fix it. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 21:13, December 17, 2019 (EST)