Editing Forum:Characters you think are the best
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
::Lol Galaxia, I like how you use my name. "Proven from virtual research from Stop Tooting." And "Lol" at Meteorite's comment. | ::Lol Galaxia, I like how you use my name. "Proven from virtual research from Stop Tooting." And "Lol" at Meteorite's comment. | ||
::Anyway, I was waiting for someone to counter my proof with one of their own ridiculous theories. Y462, your statement is saying that all disjointed hitboxes have high priority. Who knows, that could be true. But Snake's neutral A combo is also considered as a high-priority move, but it's not disjointed. [[User:Stop Tooting|Stop Tooting]] ([[User talk:Stop Tooting|talk]]) 13:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | ::Anyway, I was waiting for someone to counter my proof with one of their own ridiculous theories. Y462, your statement is saying that all disjointed hitboxes have high priority. Who knows, that could be true. But Snake's neutral A combo is also considered as a high-priority move, but it's not disjointed. [[User:Stop Tooting|Stop Tooting]] ([[User talk:Stop Tooting|talk]]) 13:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::I think I was misunderstood. I did not say that all disjointed hitboxes have high-priority. From my understanding, a disjointed hitbox is a red collision bibble that is never vurnerable to damage. [[User:Y462|Y462]] <small>([[User talk:Y462|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Y462|Contributions]] )</small> 17:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | :::I think I was misunderstood. I did not say that all disjointed hitboxes have high-priority. From my understanding, a disjointed hitbox is a red collision bibble that is never vurnerable to damage. [[User:Y462|Y462]] <small>([[User talk:Y462|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Y462|Contributions]] )</small> 17:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC) |