Talk:Mewtwo (PM)
Command Grab (toomai)
youve said this before and ive never understood it. there /is/ such a thing as a command grab in smash: http://streetfighter.wikia.com/wiki/Command_Grab . a command grab is defined as a grab move that requires a directional input and can not be broken. mewtwo's confusion is exactly this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJLO (talk • contribs) 08:44, 13 February 2014 (EST)
- I know what it means, and I'm not trying to say the technique doesn't exist. I'm saying that the phrase "command grab" is not used by smashers and so shouldn't be used by us. Instead we just say it's a special move that can grab opponents, which implies that it has special rules to control escape; there's no need to have a new term that means "can't be broken out of". Toomai Glittershine
The Incomperable 09:25, 13 February 2014 (EST)
"fortunately"
i dont actually care about this, but it would have been a MASSIVE spoiler if people had found out that mewtwo was gonna be in pm before he was announced. that's why it was "fortunate". DJLO (talk) 10:09, 20 February 2014 (EST)
- We don't make value judgements here. Just because you don't like spoilers doesn't meant there aren't parts of the community that do. We just report on the fact that the leak was barely noticed, not how it makes you feel. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 10:25, 20 February 2014 (EST)
like i said, i dont actually care what the article says. the summary given why "what was fortunate about that"? i was answering that question.DJLO (talk) 10:55, 20 February 2014 (EST)
Disable. Buff, change? (Crazymasterhand98)
paging Crazymasterhand98. it seems we now understand each other regarding disable. however, it is still isted as a nerf. disables has not suffered any nerfs. the fact that it doesnt do knockback on stunned enemies allows you to use it at least twice(which you could not do in melee since the second hit would wake them up), or you can just do a smash(like you would in melee). therefore i would call it a straight buff.
currently, you have this listed as a "change". i think that is probably ok, although i would argue it is a buff. however, it is showing up as a "nerf" even though the code says "change". maybe fix that? also thanks for editing the jab part, i think it says what we were both trying to say now. DJLO (talk) 16:13, 25 February 2014 (EST)
