Talk:Smasher: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Talk:Smasher moved to Talk:Smasher (player): A lot of people also use the term "Smasher" to reference a playable character in the Smash Bros. series)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
I'm sure everyone's tired of hearing me complain about it, but man, I gotta say...this just looks so unprofessional sitting in the "Smasher" namespace. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 20:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm sure everyone's tired of hearing me complain about it, but man, I gotta say...this just looks so unprofessional sitting in the "Smasher" namespace. --[[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 20:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
:Agreed. Moved to main namespace.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 21:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
:Agreed. Moved to main namespace.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 21:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
==Page Move==
There's no need to move [[smasher]] to [[smasher (player)]] and then re-direct [[smasher]] to the very same. This [[smasher (character)]] article you've made has some legitimacy, I think, but it's certainly not the most common definition associated with the terminology==they're characters, first and foremost. --<font color="000023">'''[[User:Randall00|RJM]]'''</font> <sup>''[[User talk:Randall00|Talk]]''</sup> 21:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:36, October 18, 2008

Ah, there needs to be a disambiguation here. --Mr Ng 22:18, October 19, 2006 (GMT)

As one of the most viewed and most linked-to pages, it needs to be spruced up considerably as well. MaskedMarth (t c) 15:05, March 19, 2007 (GMT)

Skill level descriptions

What I'd like to do is provide a definition for each of the skill levels (Amateur, Pro-am, Pro, etc.) listed here. Would this be possible, or is the definition for each skill level different for every smasher? I don't really know the definition of any of them, except maybe Pro. --YodaMasterZ 14:59, August 19, 2007 (EDT)

The usual

I'm sure everyone's tired of hearing me complain about it, but man, I gotta say...this just looks so unprofessional sitting in the "Smasher" namespace. --Randall00 20:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Moved to main namespace.--Richard 21:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Page Move

There's no need to move smasher to smasher (player) and then re-direct smasher to the very same. This smasher (character) article you've made has some legitimacy, I think, but it's certainly not the most common definition associated with the terminology==they're characters, first and foremost. --RJM Talk 21:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)