SmashWiki talk:Article of the Week/nominations archive

This page is an archive for nominations on the page SmashWiki talk:Article of the Week.

Successful votes

Item

Result: article selected as SmashWiki:Article of the Week/2007-9

Nominated for Article of the Week, Sunday February 25th to Saturday March 3rd (the 9th week of 2007)

• Nom & for – Smiddle ( Talk • Conts ) 18:34, February 18, 2007 (GMT)
• For, one of our better articles. – MaskedMarth ^{(t c)} 01:02, February 19, 2007 (GMT)
• For -- Randall00 05:21, February 19, 2007 (GMT)
• For, However I think a picture of a Capsule in the top-right corner would help spice up the page.-- Bean 06:42, February 19, 2007 (GMT)

I'm not sure what your crazy nom for lingo is referring to, but I think Global Smasher Compendium a top-notch article. -- Randall00 05:19, February 19, 2007 (GMT)

Oh, I see, "Item". Gotcha. Sure! -- Randall00 05:21, February 19, 2007 (GMT)

Nom is nominated, I think -- Bean 06:42, February 19, 2007 (GMT)

That's correct. – Smiddle ( Talk • Conts ) 09:08, February 19, 2007 (GMT)

This is pretty much consensus, agreed? – MaskedMarth ^{(t c)} 20:22, February 21, 2007 (GMT)

In any case we need to improve the opening text of "items" and beef it up a little by the end of this week. – MaskedMarth ^{(t c)} 20:43, February 21, 2007 (GMT)

Mario (universe)

Result: article selected as SmashWiki:Article of the Week/2007-10

• Nomination & for. I pretty much created the entire page, so maybe it's not even fair for me to nominate what I made. But I'm open to opinions, of course. This page is meant to be a model for all the Universe pages to follow, and each universe page aims to provide a no-nonsense franchise-based directory for SmashWiki readers. Erik the Appreciator 02:11, February 24, 2007 (GMT)
• For. Really well done. I thought of nominating it too but I wasn't sure whether or not you had any more to add. Of course, like all our articles there are things that could/should be touched up (a quick check reveals that the trophy list isn't linking to trophies, for example) but this is far and away one of our best articles, and a great example for other universe pages to follow. Maybe my biggest concern is the naming convention; though it doesn't apply here, disambiguation text (the stuff in parenthesis) should only be used if there's another article with the same name... but now I'm kind of on a tangent. --Kirby King 00:52, February 25, 2007 (GMT)
• Strong For, once we get the technical things sorted out. Let's save this article for SmashWiki's unveiling. – MaskedMarth ^{(t c)} 17:03, February 25, 2007 (GMT)
• For. Use of the word "mustachioed" makes this hands-down the best URL on the internet. :^) -- Randall00 16:56, February 26, 2007 (GMT)

Unsuccessful votes

Global Smasher Compendium

• Nom & for, In addition to being a well-written article, it's also an important one to expose to the masses. -- Randall00 16:00, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
• Against. Parts read like a mix between a help file and a guide, others are more encyclopedic. Images should probably be thumbnailed, and there are some that I don't think belong at all. Besides that, I think right now it's important that we highlight articles that will help newcomers see what we hope all articles will look like, and even if I didn't see any problems with this one, it's not very helpful in writing an article about a character or a stage. --Kirby King 17:23, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
• Against, what KK said. It's more of a guide. One of the first things in the article are download links, and in the end there are lot of images. Also, the word "you" and imperative verb moods are overused. – Smiddle ( Talk • Conts ) 17:29, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
• Against, per KK and AltAcnt. Though, I think GSC could be a potential candidate if its focus was on its history/significance instead of how to use it and the system requirements. – MaskedMarth ^{(t c)} 17:37, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
  • kk, how about now? :^) -- Randall00 21:56, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
    • No. Still, there are a lot of you's, and imperative moods. Also, there are two translations to work on. I can help you with the Swedish one, but I'm a very poor French speaker. – Smiddle ( Talk • Conts ) 22:36, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
    • Well it's as comprehensive as it will ever be in English and I removed the "you" completely now. As to the imperative moods, it's hard enough to give instructions without using "you" but it's more important for the information to be available in its most useful form than it is to scrutinize the tone. Either way, I did forget about the translations so it looks like this is going to take much longer than anticipated. -- Randall00 16:34, February 26, 2007 (GMT)

Luigi (SSBM)

• Nomination & for. I've cleaned up the page considerably in the past two days and I think it's one of our better pages. – MaskedMarth ^{(t c)} 00:46, February 24, 2007 (GMT)
• For. Although I would really like to see standardization with the character pages, I like the way this page flows off the page. Standardization should happen after SSBB, however, when we know what to add for every character and page. Good job, Mask. Oddeven2002 01:10, February 24, 2007 (GMT)
• Against. Haha, thanks for polishing that moveset off for me, Masked. That's something I've been putting off forever! Still needs info on the throws and other miscellaneous Luigi attacks if comprehensiveness is what we seek. It's an excellent article in its current form, yes, but I'm not sure this is quite the model for all character articles. Also, there's this pile of Character-specific match-up categories. Are we really going to be able to pull that off? If so, Luigi's article should link to it. If not, we ought to get around to deleting those pages. I have a hard time believing we're going to find anyone who knows a lot about a Yoshi vs. Zelda match-up. -- Randall00 16:50, February 26, 2007 (GMT)
• Comment - My personal assessment of this article: I think the main shortcomings of this article is that it has too strong a focus on Luigi in competitive play, and is not organized very well - as you said, it is not the model for character articles we're looking for, but rather a well-crafted article in a flawed mold. I'd say the character match-ups are peripheral issues and don't play a significant factor in the Luigi (SSBM) article. Methinks we should begin by adding general information about Luigi - how he is portrayed in SSBM, where in the 1-player mode he appears, et cetera. A comprehensive moveset can come afterwards, but there really isn't much to say about Luigi's down tilt or forward throw. – MaskedMarth ^{(t c)} 22:55, February 27, 2007 (GMT)