Removing spirit battlesEdit
If you want to remove it, first make a proposal and state reasons as why you should. Major removals like those shouldn't happen without a proposal. Cookies Creme 20:48, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- There already was one. I am acting upon it because no one else has yet. 66.194.104.5 20:52, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- And where is it? Cookies Creme 20:53, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Forum:Adding_Spirit_battle_sections_to_stages_(similar_to_the_ones_on_Fighter_pages)&t=20190909205153 66.194.104.5 20:54, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- This proposal is about spirit battles to stages, not characters. Cookies Creme 20:56, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- It's the same principle. They were using the character pages as a support for it, but then it was said that there was no point to include the battles for at all for either. 66.194.104.5 21:00, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- This proposal is about spirit battles to stages, not characters. Cookies Creme 20:56, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Forum:Adding_Spirit_battle_sections_to_stages_(similar_to_the_ones_on_Fighter_pages)&t=20190909205153 66.194.104.5 20:54, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- And where is it? Cookies Creme 20:53, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
Might as well state this already, do not revert another user's reversion as per SW:1RV. If you have a complaint, bring it to the talk page. Cookies Creme 20:58, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- Then please don't do it to me either. 66.194.104.5 21:00, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- I was simply undoing it for violating 1RV and bringing it to the talk page. Also, the compromise has already been talked about in the talk page, so instead of complaining about me "edit warring" you should bring up your opinion instead. Cookies Creme 21:02, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- It's how it is on this wiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.104.5 (talk • contribs) 21:04, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- I was simply undoing it for violating 1RV and bringing it to the talk page. Also, the compromise has already been talked about in the talk page, so instead of complaining about me "edit warring" you should bring up your opinion instead. Cookies Creme 21:02, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
SW:1RVEdit
Take this as an admin warning. You cannot bend a consensus for X set of articles and apply it to unrelated Y set, especially when y set is much more viable for the information. SerpentKing 21:16, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
- Ok then. 66.194.104.5 21:31, September 25, 2019 (EDT)