Template talk:Companies

Seems good. It definitely makes sense in terms of where a reader would navigate to next. Nyargleblargle (Talk | Contribs) 18:26, 18 November 2015 (EST)

Yeah, I figured something like this would make the company pages more navigable. It seems pretty non-controversial to me, but I'll wait a couple days to implement it in case someone has an issue with it they want to bring up or a suggestion for improvement. Miles (talk) 18:31, 18 November 2015 (EST)

Might I ask why Rare is italicized? I bet I can guess why, but I want to make sure. Aidan, the Wandering Space Warrior 15:57, 20 November 2015 (EST)

Former second-party. I wasn't sure if it a note indicating that was needed, or if the italics were sufficient on their own. Miles (talk) 16:02, 20 November 2015 (EST)

Western companies having a Japanese name

Should Western companies listed in the template have Japannese translation names for them? Juju1995 (talk) 01:44, July 24, 2019 (EDT)

Such as? Aidan, the Rurouni 01:48, July 24, 2019 (EDT)

Take, for instance, Microsoft. It doesn't have a Japanese translation name as it is an American-based company. On that subject, Nintendo-owned developer Retro Studios is located in Texas, so should it be given a translation also? Juju1995 (talk) 02:15, July 24, 2019 (EDT)

Subsidiaries in parentheses

In the template, subsidiary companies are displayed next to their parent companies in parentheses. Should we do the same thing with Monolith Soft, Retro Studios, and 1-Up Studio? As they're Nintendo-owned subsidiaries. Juju1995 (talk) 18:57, August 21, 2019 (EDT)