Talk:Rufio
I do believe that this combo is well used with Meta Knight but if it doesn't have a proper name, we could mention it on his character pages or in his moveset subpages. Dots (talk) 
The Jiggly 14:17, 26 December 2015 (EST)
- Found one. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 14:31, 26 December 2015 (EST)
Bump, and Strong Support for deletion. It doesn't need this much detail.98.157.202.185 15:05, 30 December 2015 (EST)Support Definitely deserves a mention on MK's pages, but I don't think it's notable enough to warrant its own page.Disaster Flare
(talk) 15:07, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Slight opposition I definitely agree with DF and anon, but let's not forget these two. Yes, I know they're Smash 64, but just because this one's Brawl doesn't make it any less important. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- The problem is unlike the two you mentioned, I've never even heard of this combo, which unfamiliarity in itself kinda hurts credibility. Disaster Flare (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Smashboards didn't have a lot on this subject as well. I'll stick to my opinion, but I'm aware it's only a matter before the page gets deleted. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Strong opposition This term is widely used between top players like ZeRo, Seibrik and Mew2King and this combo is very relevant in both games, as it's a core of Meta Knight's gameplay. Never hearing about the term is not a reason for deletion, actually Wiki pages are for people to learn things, like this term. There's absolutely no reason for deleting this page. Joaco (talk) 03:55, 31 December 2015 (EST)
- Smashboards didn't have a lot on this subject as well. I'll stick to my opinion, but I'm aware it's only a matter before the page gets deleted. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- The problem is unlike the two you mentioned, I've never even heard of this combo, which unfamiliarity in itself kinda hurts credibility. Disaster Flare
- Slight opposition I definitely agree with DF and anon, but let's not forget these two. Yes, I know they're Smash 64, but just because this one's Brawl doesn't make it any less important. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2015 (EST)
I oppose per Joaco. Not knowing about something does not, in itself, warrant it's deletion. I was unaware of what this was, and after reading the article, I now know. It has a purpose and it should stay. Serpent 
King 04:07, 31 December 2015 (EST)
Oppose I heard this term before in Brawl, when I watched the stream in the past. It does exist in Smash 4. Like Joaco, never hearing about this term does not mean deletion. Luigi540 (talk) 12:56, 31 December 2015 (EST)
oppose yeah i heard of this combo before Nintendofan1653 (talk) the true north strong and free 13:26, 31 December 2015 (EST)
Oppose. The combo itself is still a fairly notable thing, regardless of its name. John 
PK SMAAAASH!! 13:31, 31 December 2015 (EST)
Oppose Don't know if my response is appropriate since I created the page. Like Joaco said, wiki pages are for readers to learn things. This combo is central to Meta Knight's play style in both games; almost every notable Smash 4 Meta Knight main has pulled off the combo, including Ito, Leo, and Abadango, and others. Since it's arguably one of the more iconic combos, it deserves a page that details it. Dhia 12:58 AM, 1 January 2016
- Changing my opinion to oppose. I still honestly think compared to other combos like the Greenhouse, it's not notable enough for a page, but the current results in itself prove that people want to keep it for a reason. Disaster Flare (talk) 14:58, 1 January 2016 (EST)
- I change to Oppose per DF. 98.157.202.185 15:13, 1 January 2016 (EST)
