Talk:Ghosts

Article has been moved

It appears that this page was move Ghosts to Blinky, Pinky, Inky, and Clyde. (Smashworker101 (talk) 21:04, 9 November 2014 (EST))

Nope, I moved it back. You shouldn't move a page without discussing it first with the community. Rtzxy Reflect!!! 21:07, 9 November 2014 (EST)

However, that's not to say I think it's a bad move. "Blinky, Pinky, Inky, and Clyde" wouldn't be a bad name for an article, but I'm neutral about this move. For now, don't move it back (it would violate a policy here), but let's see what the rest of the community says about it before moving it. Rtzxy Reflect!!! 21:10, 9 November 2014 (EST)

Personally, I oppose it. Ghosts is a better term, in my opinion. The other title feels too long, and kind of awkward, too. Mistiryshak (talk) 21:16, 9 November 2014 (EST)

Borderline Oppose Collectively, they're called the Ghosts in official mediums. Individually, they're Inky, Blinky, Pinky and Clyde. Since the article is about them collectively, I think it's best they stay this way. It's interchangeable, really. Also, any input on the name order? I remember their order being Inky, Pinky, Blinky and Clyde, but it's been years since I played any Pac-Man game. Roarmoocowz (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2014 (EST)

Vehement oppose. They either have one page as "Ghosts" or individual pages (which I'd also oppose); under no circumstances is a list of four a workable page title. Miles (talk) 21:50, 9 November 2014 (EST)