Talk:Bowser (SSBU)
Flying Slam
The Sacrifical KO page is saying that Bowser now always wins to Bowsercide. Yet this information has yet to be displayed on this page. Can anyone confirm if Flying Slam now lets Bowser win?
Mjmannella (talk) 10:13, 16 September 2018 (EDT)
BOWSER (SSBU) LACKS COMPETITIVE PLAYER NAMES.
216.235.150.229 08:22, March 14, 2019 (EDT)
Wait
...I could have sworn I was removing the opinionated sentence...Alex the Jigglypuff trainer 17:23, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
- Yea, I was going to ask you about that. Aidan, the Rurouni 17:23, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
- I deadass stared at those undos like "what is going on" before I finally realized how dumb I am. Disaster Flare
(talk) 19:07, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
- I deadass stared at those undos like "what is going on" before I finally realized how dumb I am. Disaster Flare
Bowser viability
Is there even any proof that Bowser is viable.
- The metegame is still too young to make a final definitive decision, but Bowser has great results so far so I would say yes. Cookies
Creme 12:24, October 13, 2019 (EDT)
Changing a line in his "Changes from Smash 4" section
"Bowser has earned great representation in Ultimate's early metagame, thanks to players such as LeoN, who has taken sets off of top players like Nairo, Cosmos, Marss, Dabuz and Light."
I'm changing the line, as of the moment I'm writing this discussion, to "Thanks to this, Bowser has earned great representation in Ultimate's competitive play, thanks to players such as LeoN, who has taken sets off of many notable top players in tournament play.", since his most notable names are listed in the "In competitive play" section already. Beep (talk) 16:12, December 9, 2019 (EST)
- Sounds good. Just as a general bit of advice, by the way: you don't have to write talk page entries for this kind of thing unless someone undoes it and you want to explain your reasoning. ~ Serena Strawberry (talk) 16:22, December 9, 2019 (EST)
- You see, there is a line after the phrase that was hidden, which said: "PLEASE STOP changing this sentence. Any further attempts will be considered edit warring and immediately reverted. If you wish to discuss it, do so on the talk page.". That's why I had to bring it up here. Beep (talk) 16:34, December 9, 2019 (EST)
- Ah, my mistake, I'm not super familiar with this page. But yeah, that feels like a fine change; I assume there was an edit war earlier but this is A-OK in my eyes. ~ Serena Strawberry (talk) 16:42, December 9, 2019 (EST)
- You see, there is a line after the phrase that was hidden, which said: "PLEASE STOP changing this sentence. Any further attempts will be considered edit warring and immediately reverted. If you wish to discuss it, do so on the talk page.". That's why I had to bring it up here. Beep (talk) 16:34, December 9, 2019 (EST)
