SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Smorekingxg456
Result: RfR passed. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Smorekingxg456
Whoo. O.K. Here I go.
I am running for rollback because I am on Smashwiki as much as I can(which is nearly the entire weekend, and sometimes Mon-Fri), I consider myself trustworthy, and I haven't vandalized and I am against vandalism(remember LarioGalaxy, IhaetMeteorite, or MarioGlaxay? I reverted many of their edits). I feel that not much more should be said, as it is just rollback, which can only be used against vandals, and with this message, I hope you support my RfR. Thank you. Oh, one more thing I know how this works, I'm an admin at two wikis, so don't say I'm inexperienced.Smorekingxg456 19:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Votes/Comments
- Strong Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 19:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Massive support. Smoreking is definitely trustworthy and anti-vandal enough to merit this tool. Miles (talk - contribs) 20:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Do I really have to repeat it? Cheezperson {talk}stuff 20:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support. You're kidding, right? You kept an eye on my page for both of those vandals. You also helped against IPs such as the several IPs that wrote stuff like, "One of my favorites!" "I like this guy!" "This stage stinks!", among others.
Only improvement I suggest is a little more time here on SmashWiki. How about you break your collarbone? Worked for me (then again, it was inadvertent, so, heh).You deserve to have rollback abilities. MarioGalaxy {talk} 20:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- VERY Slight Support I do not know you very well, but I know you enough to support you. ParaGoomba348 (C'mon, just eat turkey) 23:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose: This guy still occasionally contributes stuff that's borderline vandalism. I don't think this user would do good with rollback powers. Silverdragon706/FyreNWater - (T • C ) 07:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose: 1) See FyreNWater. 2) Unless I'm missing something, of SmoreKing's last 500 edits, a grand total of 6 were reverts, so why exactly does he need/warrant rollback privileges? – Defiant Elements 05:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Rollback's main purpose is to stop vandalism. As long as a user is active, and is not a vandal (I've never seen or heard of any instances where SK has vandalized), he or she, in my opinion, is worthy. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 23:20, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- I still have reservations about Smoreking, particularly when it comes to how he responds to vandals (i.e. he doesn't always seem to realize the value of dealing with vandals quietly), but he's been more active in combating vandalism as of late, so I'm withdrawing my opposition for now. – Defiant Elements +talk 21:10, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, and I understand what you're getting at, and I don't blame you, but I hope that changes with time.SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 22:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ultimate Support. helpful, supportive, and intelligent. Xtrme Pumpkin Pie! Turkey! 21:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support You revert vandalism, thats pretty much all you need to be rollback JtM =^] (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support One of the most active on this wiki, friendly, and not a vandal. Friedbeef1 Argue 20:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support What everybody else has said. Baltro [ talk ] 05:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Although you can't rly keep the srs bsns thing flowin' you're still a good editor and vandal-fighter.
Koopa Claus 20:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC) - Support. His contributions show a good number of reverts, and I think he'd do great with these tools.SZL (talk) 23:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I Move For Close In Support. KP317 (talk) 19:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
