Forum:Regional smasher categories and subcategories

The question is simple: If someone is in Category:New York smashers, should they also be in Category:American smashers? The current status quo seems to be "yes", which in my opinion defeats the purpose of subcategories. Toomai Glittershine The Brass 09:41, 8 November 2012 (EST)

I support this. We should have them in all regional categories so that people can find smashers easily. The Awesome 15:30, 8 November 2012 (EST)

This is a discussion, not a support/oppose situation. Toomai Glittershine The Wacko 20:13, 8 November 2012 (EST)

The American Smashers category should be for organising the state categories, not smashers themselves, as it's redundant to put a smasher in a state category and then into the American category.

Related, smashers should be taken out of and stop being put into Category:Pros. That category is for organising the character specific pros categories, and putting smashers into it is redundant. Omega Tyrant 21:29, 8 November 2012 (EST)

OT has said pretty much all I wish to say. Do you think we could reprogram NotAnOuendan to remove categories? Air Conditioner :D 20:28, 9 November 2012 (EST)

I concur with what OT says. --RoyboyX Talk 09:36, 10 November 2012 (EST)

Does this mean we don't need the Category:American smashers anymore?-- PSIWolf The one and only! 09:40, 10 November 2012 (EST)

...No. What OT is saying and I am agreeing on is that only the categories for Smashers from specific states will be categorized in the American smashers category, rather than having everyone categorized in both types of categories. --RoyboyX Talk 09:42, 10 November 2012 (EST)

And with "specific states" you mean the more important states in Smash?-- PSIWolf The one and only! 09:53, 10 November 2012 (EST)

Again, no. Specific states, I meant individual states. --RoyboyX Talk 10:05, 10 November 2012 (EST)

The United States PSIWolf, there's 50 of them, and we organise smashers into which State they come from. Omega Tyrant 13:55, 10 November 2012 (EST)

I get that, but do you also want them in the American smasher category besides the state categories? Because they are at this moment.-- PSIWolf The one and only! 14:20, 10 November 2012 (EST)

That's exactly what he doesn't want. --RoyboyX Talk 14:20, 10 November 2012 (EST)

All right. I wouldn't want it either.-- PSIWolf The one and only! 14:24, 10 November 2012 (EST)

Air Conditioner points to NotAnOuendan now that we've basically reached consensus Air Conditioner No time for losers! 19:31, 10 November 2012 (EST)

If you want NotAnOuendan to operate for this, contact Fugudev. The Awesome 11:18, 17 November 2012 (EST)

Um we've only had three or four people give their opinions so far, so we're not doing anything yet. Toomai Glittershine The Hammer 10:02, 18 November 2012 (EST)

K then, I'll agree with everybody here; individual smashers shouldn't go in the mother category. Toast ltimatum 10:09, 18 November 2012 (EST)

I agree too. Its obvious that any smashers who lives in any state would be from the United States and it doesn't mean that they have to go to get categorized into the whole american category. Dots The Thanksgiving 10:26, 18 November 2012 (EST)

I also agree for the aforementioned reasons. Mousehunter321 (talk · contributions) 02:53, 21 November 2012 (EST)

Poking this one last time, if no one provides a good counterargument shortly then we're good. Toomai Glittershine The Incomperable 23:59, 30 November 2012 (EST)

I support --LoS PPS KoRos (talk) 21:49, 2 December 2012 (EST)

I think we all agree to this Toomai. Now all we need to do is to discuss on this and everything will be just fine. Dots The Engineer 21:05, 3 December 2012 (EST)

Wait. If an American smasher belongs in their respective state category, then what's the point of having an American smasher category in the first place? BlueRidiculous (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2012 (EST)

It contains the state categories, which contain American smashers who lives in their respective states. Dots The Mew 23:03, 30 December 2012 (EST)

Oh. Then yes, I'm pretty sure there's no arguement about this. BlueRidiculous (talk) 23:31, 30 December 2012 (EST)