Information for "Forum:Is this game really more balanced than Brawl?"

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Basic information

Display titleForum:Is this game really more balanced than Brawl?
Default sort keyIs this game really more balanced than Brawl?
Page length (in bytes)9,287
NamespaceForum
Page ID20987
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditNo extra protection (infinite)
MoveNo extra protection (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorMr. Anon (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation19:38, June 12, 2010
Latest editorMax Elite (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit02:59, January 18, 2020
Total number of edits21
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Magic word (1)
  • __NEWSECTIONLINK__
Transcluded template (1)

Template used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
I often hear Melee player who hate brawl say "OMG Brawl nerfed Fox and MK is so cheap". While both of these are through, the statement is misleading. While many characters that were good in Melee were nerfed in Brawl, their nerfs were not that bad. This is compared to Kirby's nerf from smash 64 to Melee. Also consider that in Melee, because of really cheap wavedashing and L-Cancelling, Fox, Sheik, C. Falcon, Falco etc dominate, while Kirby, Ness, Pichu, Mewtwo and Bowser are so bad they are unplayable. Opinions? Mr. Anon 23:38, June 12, 2010
Information from Extension:WikiSEO