Smasher talk:CPU

Wait, that's it? He played at this one tournament, and then vanished? This article seems pretty sparse of info. --160.39.188.134 16:56, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * He beat Ken at Evo 2008, thanks to the dumb idea that items should be on medium. He abused ROBs final smash en route to a rather controversial victory over Ken Hoang.  Once items were banned in tourneys, he has made no noticeable impact to my knowledge.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 17:33, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Items were also used at EVO.thats not skill JtM =^&#93; (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Controversy section?
Should there be a note concerning all the controversy CPU has gotten for beating Ken in a VERY controversial tournament? Also, I don't think the stages of the matches matter. capefeather (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't think CPU should've been on here, the only reason he beaten Ken was because he abused the Final Smash and items, and that's not skill it's a skill that noobs only use. If there was no items, Ken would've won, there might've also been a possible chance that he wouldn't have retiredfrom Super Smash Bros.--Ryou Seiji (talk) 14:58, June 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * This is arguable. While CPU did abuse items, he abused them well. What I'm saying is, despite how over-powered the items are, CPU didn't win through chance. I agree Ken would have won without items, but that doesn't necessarily mean that Ken should be considered more skilled. It's like saying that a Meta Knight player would have won in a tourney if Norfair was legal, so he is more skilled than the other player who beat him. 124.171.84.193 02:29, September 12, 2010 (UTC)