Talk:Thorn helix

Title
Since this has to get moved to a singular title anyway, what do you say to the name I was planning to give of "Thorn Helix"? Toomai Glittershine The SMASH-GINEER 13:19, 2 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Sounds good. Mr.  Anon MatchupUnknown.png talk   13:23, 2 October 2011 (EDT)

Deletion
Oppose: Once a hazard, always a hazard. It doesn't matter that it only appeared in two levels, it's still a unique 'enemy' with its own hitboxes. It may be minor, but as the definitive Super Smash Bros. wiki, the only wiki on which the thorn helix would matter, our scope should still cover this type of thing. Toast  ltimatum  17:10, 28 July 2014 (EDT)

Oppose. No reason to get rid of this. Miles ( talk)  17:11, 28 July 2014 (EDT)

Oppose per the above, but I have a question as well: Why is the first letter of the second word in this article's title lower-case, while the first letter of the second word of Quark Mine is upper-case? "Mine" isn't a proper noun. Shouldn't we be consistent and move this to "Thorn Helix," or the other article to "Quark mine"?  Blue  Ninjakoopa  17:25, 28 July 2014 (EDT)

Oppose It is a very unique object. If you flagged this for deletion then you might as well flag Quark mine for deletion. Awesomelink234 (talk) 17:33, 28 July 2014 (EDT)

Oppose, as I don't see why this should be removed. Sure, it's only in a couple stages, but it's prominent enough in them to warrant a page. Berrenta (talk) 17:35, 28 July 2014 (EDT)

Oppose How much this deserves a page is no different to how much all the other SSE hazards deserve a page. S c r 7 (talk · contribs) 17:42, 28 July 2014 (EDT)

Oppose Per Toast, such specificity is important in this case. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 19:15, 28 July 2014 (EDT)