Category talk:VIP players

So are there any established standards for inclusion in this list?--Dinodomain (talk) 02:16, 22 September 2015 (EDT)
 * I also have the same to say about Category:VIP contributors--Dinodomain (talk) 02:21, 22 September 2015 (EDT)
 * They must consistently place well in both large tournaments and in high importance PRs (like NorCal). For contributors, they can be credited for discovering a groundbreaking technique or play style like Isai did with Falcon.  Serpent ∞ King   ( talk ) 02:24, 22 September 2015 (EDT)
 * It is my opinion that both are complete at the moment.  Serpent ∞ King   ( talk ) 02:25, 22 September 2015 (EDT)

Split by games
How necessary do we think this is? I am honestly not sure myself. I can see why we would want to, but I can also see where it doesn't make much difference.  Serpent   King  11:09, 7 February 2018 (EST)

Oppose as per SK, and also because I think this is pointless busywork with no tangible benefit. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 00:38, 14 February 2018 (EST)

Eh, I feel like doing regions would be overkill. I feel that doing it by game would make more sense, and then maybe adding flags next to it to indicate the region would make more sense. Simply dividing by game is already a good bit since there are so many players out there. Just doing flags would make more sense. It's not necessarily a required fix, but it's not a bad idea nonetheless. TimmaTurtle (talk) 14:40, 18 February 2018 (EST) TimmaTurtle

Oppose as per SK. St. Reggie,  the Iron Leprachaun Warrior  00:20, 2 March 2018 (EST)

Motion to declare this proposal failed, 'no quorum'. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 23:42, 5 March 2018 (EST)