User talk:Emmett/Archive 2

User:Shadowcrest
Is this an impostor or did you register two accounts? --Porplemontage 17:16, 28 September 2010 (EDT)
 * They are both me. I didn't want anyone registering SC to impersonate me, but on other wikis I've switched to Emmett (but couldn't because it was already registered on wikia). Emmett  17:33, 28 September 2010 (EDT)
 * Ok. --Porplemontage 17:34, 28 September 2010 (EDT)
 * (Confirmation that I have both accounts) Shadowcrest 17:38, 28 September 2010 (EDT)
 * It'll be hard getting used to calling you Emmett, since I've known you as Shadowcrest for so long D: Mr. Anon 00:54, 29 September 2010 (EDT)
 * You're still welcome to call me either :p Emmett  11:06, 29 September 2010 (EDT)

Rollback
So if you want to require admins to rerequest, what about Rollbackers? Or wait you don't even support having an RfR policy. Can we even set users to just have Rollback? If you look here, there is no rollback option, but there is an added "Patrolman" option. I'm in no hurry to have these questions answered; it's just something I want you to keep in the back of your mind and eventually discuss with Clarinet Hawk (if and when he comes over) and the other sysops. Dr. Pain 99 09:13, 29 September 2010 (EDT)
 * I'm going to work with NIWA to see what's going on. Not sure to what extent we can edit groups, but I'll try. Emmett  11:06, 29 September 2010 (EDT)

Policy opinions
Elaborate on your sentiments of the policies mentioned on your userpage please. Toomai 12:22, 29 September 2010 (EDT)
 * Do you mean the general idea, or each specific policy that I mentioned? Emmett  14:00, 29 September 2010 (EDT)
 * The specifics; I can understand the general idea of "we're kind of starting over, we might as well have a look at everything". &#123;&#123;SUBST:User:Toomai/sig}} 14:18, 29 September 2010 (EDT)
 * Ban/Del/Prot policies are stupid. As is a vandalism policy. I expect sysops to know what the tools are and I expect them not to need a policy to dictate when (not) to use the tools.
 * RfR: unnecessary bureaucracy and waste of time. (Honestly I'm not even sure having a rollback usergroup is worth the trouble-- people on SmashWikia abused it all the time.) If we decide to have a group of rollbackers, they can just ask a bureaucrat for the tools-- there's really no reason to open a formal red-tapey process for something that is so pointless. Bias is not an issue because even if bias was present (which I generally think myself and C.Hawk can avoid), it's rollback so what does it really matter?
 * RfB: This is again something that I think could just be decided by the bureaucrats on a "do we need another one, and if so who's good for the job" basis. Most users don't really interact with bureaucrats (as bureaucrats anyway) and often don't really understand what the job entails, making RfBs just a prop to appease the crowd. I think the bureaucrats can be trusted to find other good bureaucrats for the job. This one is probably controversial and I won't be too surprised if consensus wants to keep RfBs anyway, but I personally don't see a need.
 * I'll get around to writing drafts of the tweak category sometime soon. Emmett  19:14, 1 October 2010 (EDT)


 * We maybe can use that weird "patroller" user group for users who want to revert vandalism, but don't necessarily need sysop rights. It seems unnecessary to me, but if the vandalism gets bad we can implement an "RfP" policy or something. Dr. Pain 99 19:26, 1 October 2010 (EDT)


 * I would agree with not having Ban/Del/Prot policies for the reasons you stated and not having a RfR to acquire Rollback. Although, I think we should still have rollbackers as in my experience, I saw rollback get used properly more often than not (though I have saw misuse of rollback more than I should have). As for the RfBs, I think community input would be important in deciding a new bureaucrat. As such, I think RfBs should be kept to see if the community trusts the candidate as a bureaucrat and just like on a RfA, supports and opposes for irrelevant/blind reasons can always be ignored by the deciding bureaucrat. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 19:46, 1 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Speaking of Rollback, can I (and others who had it) have rollback here? Mr. Anon (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
 * But the thing is, considering the frequency of abuse, I'd rather just have people use a manual undo all the time. I don't see the point in giving a tool to a bunch of people who will just misuse it when they already have everything they need. Emmett  07:50, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
 * That's a good point, but it would be rather unfair in my opinion to those who did use rollback properly and did not abuse it. Although, I don't care too much either way if we still give rollback to users. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 17:36, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
 * I like the idea of having a rollback group for two reasons - we don't need as many admins to easily counteract most vandalism, and we get a better idea of who future admins could be. Also, I don't think I've seen as much rollback abuse as I believe you're claiming. Toomai Glittershine [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Data Node|Data Node]] 18:12, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Yeah, the only abuse I've seen is by BNK during that one edit war. Mr. Anon (talk) 18:21, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
 * @Anon: Then you don't pay very much attention.
 * @Toomai: I don't see it as an admin-indicator at all. I would never in a million years promote nearly any of the users with rollback to sysop. Also, everyone can already easily revert vandalism-- only difference is that it takes 1 click with rollback instead of 3 by undoing.
 * @OT: I don't see it as unfair, because they're losing a tool that was purely superfluous to begin with. It's also not meant to be a reward for good editing, either, merely a tool to (marginally) assist qualified users in reverting vandalism. If people are legitimately disappointed in losing rollback, they're probably not qualified to be in any elevated position anyway... Emmett  18:35, 2 October 2010 (EDT)

moving pages
As another note, I seem to have lost my ability to move pages. Can I (and other users with this problem) have this back, as I wish to archive my talk page now. Mr. Anon (talk) 23:33, 4 October 2010 (EDT)
 * See User_talk:Porplemontage. I'd be happy to move it for you if you tell me where you want it to go though. Emmett  14:41, 5 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Well, the thing is that I wanted to archive only specific discussions. It's OK, though, since I can wait the week. Thanks for the offer, though. Mr. Anon (talk) 21:21, 5 October 2010 (EDT)
 * You can't archive specific sections with a move... Emmett  15:34, 6 October 2010 (EDT)

Rights on SmashWikia
Please remove any userrights I have there. As well, make my green font here go away.

Cheers.

Sky2042 (talk) 02:10, 7 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Done! Emmett  16:46, 7 October 2010 (EDT)

Editing others' user pages
Hey, in case you're not aware, standard account users can't edit anyone else's user pages. Before, I was trying to remove a bunch of unwanted user pages from the Smasher category, and couldn't do it because I wasn't allowed to edit them. So I had to get OT to do it and that was kind of an inconvenience. This probably isn't any sort of major issue, but yeah, just letting you know. Shark  (talk)  04:18, 11 October 2010 (EDT)
 * I already gotten that problem taken care of. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 04:50, 11 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Thanks. Shark   (talk)  08:09, 11 October 2010 (EDT)

gig
&rarr; moved to User talk:Gig

"One thing that I think I accidentally beat into the culture of SmashWiki is the ideas that policies are laws that form the backbone that must always be followed or else. This is not the case at all. Wikis are based on discussion and consensus, and blindly following rules (sometimes even to the point of harming the wiki just to be "by the book") is stupid."

do you enjoy having split personalitys?or are you just unaware how contradicting your beliefs and views areGig (talk) 03:44, 13 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Change over time. Be aware of it.-- Mega  Tron1  XD  Decepticon.png 10:15, 13 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Lol. – Emmett  19:15, 13 October 2010 (EDT)

Induction
How soon would you guys like to be added to the NIWA hub? That's pretty much constituting official niwa entry. Per tradition and activity optimization, any new members are added on Friday, any particular Friday you guys would like or an ASAP sorta thing? Or is there a particular goal you'd like to reach? Malake256 (talk) 23:10, 14 October 2010 (EDT)
 * I don't have a preference for a specific Friday, but since we do seem to have all the content ready, I think the sooner we're added, the better. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 11:19, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Seconded. Shall we say the 22nd? (And put us towards the top, please.) Miles ( talk)   12:30, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Sorry can't give any wiki special treatment, so we went with alphabetical. Otherwise it just wouldn't be very fair. Need some more feedback pplz! We will need a logo and a favicon would be nice too Malake256 (talk) 14:09, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Then the poll for the new logo will end on Wednesday or Thursday?- Ivy 73 [[File:002MS.png]] 14:22, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
 * /humor
 * As for logo... does Wiki.png work? Miles ( talk)   14:22, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
 * best to wait 'till after ur logo's chosen. Also, are you guys planning on changing to a custom skin? Most NIWA wikis have one. If you guys need help, just ask on the forums and we are more than willing to Malake256 (talk) 14:38, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
 * That logo proposal might take a while, there's no clear front runner. As for the skin, I'm fine with a custom skin as long as it doesn't slow down the loading speeds, like many of the other NIWA Wikis do. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 14:49, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Seconded OT on that one as well. Boring skin is better than slow skin.  Miles ( talk)   17:40, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
 * Haha imo, beautiful skin > faster skin, Metroid Wiki isn't terribly slow. But yeah, as for inclusion, there's a bit of a debate on how soon, sorry, but I can assure you if not this Friday, next Friday. Also, once you guys are a part of NIWA, your staff members are automatically granted Admin rights on NIWA's forums, allowing you to vote on future events or basically have a say on how things go down. Malake256 (talk) 22:53, 19 October 2010 (EDT)

Alright, to be perfectly clear here, that's you. Malake256 (talk) 19:48, 21 October 2010 (EDT)

I hope that no one at this site has the nerve to show themselves back at wikia. Truly, this pathetic excuse for a wiki makes me laugh in so many ways that I am literally about to die. The administration is awful, evreything about this wiki is awful. Don't let me catch your slimy faces back at the real wikia. --Piratehunter (talk) 20:11, 29 January 2011 (EST)
 * You do know this user is no longer active and so posting here is a waste of time? Toomai Glittershine [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] Le Grand Fromage 20:20, 29 January 2011 (EST)

IRC
Uhm, sorry for the wind up, but SmashPeter on IRC was me on a separate tab. Can I ask that either I be unblocked, or at least you tell me how long I'm going to be blocked for? I'm sorry for tricking you guys. Toast  ltimatum  Complaints Box  10:10, 26 October 2011 (EDT)

Hey
Actually sign your comments with four tildes instead of --Emmett. Blin dCol ours Thank you for reading my sig. 21:32, 27 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Nevermind. I figured it out. Blin dCol ours Thank you for reading my sig. 21:38, 27 October 2011 (EDT)

Brawl?
Can you brawl with me? i really want to fight someone good, sick of lvl.9s. fc-3266 7534 8389 Pokémon  ultimate    22:57, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 * I am not that good and my Wii is unable to play Brawl. OT is a more suitable challenger. I appreciate the offer though :p – Emmett  18:20, 10 November 2011 (EST)

Stop Posting Here
Don't fully protect pages, especially not if you think it's OK to put summaries like "stop posting here". Block yourself! CrashPeter (talk) 11:56, 12 January 2012 (EST)

Question
Are you really the first/oldest user on this Wiki? According to this, you are, but I wanted to hear from you if you really are the first. THE AVENGING BANDIT 16:38, 17 January 2012 (EST)
 * Emmett was the first to join this version of the Wiki. However, he was not the first to join back when we were on Wikia. The first to join that was Porplemontage, as he was the founder of SmashWiki. Toast  Wii U Logo Transparent.png ltimatum Transparent Swadloon.png 18:00, 17 January 2012 (EST)
 * You're wrong, Toast. See the about page. Miles ( talk)   18:38, 17 January 2012 (EST)
 * This wiki has two people who can claim to be founders. The first is Kirby King, who created the Smashboards version. The second is Alexir, who originally created SmashWikia. The two wikis later merged. Mr.  Anon MatchupUnknown.png talk   21:06, 17 January 2012 (EST)
 * I have the user IDs 2 and 3-- Porplemontage has the first. Also I should totes be listed on the About page, for coordinating the transfer and just being awesome. – Emmett  22:36, 17 January 2012 (EST)

Ping
I'm thinking about banning IPs for 603431 years again. Semicolon (talk) 00:43, 27 April 2012 (EDT)
 * I really don't log in here enough. Why haven't you thought to email me yet? :p – Emmett  20:25, 19 May 2012 (EDT)
 * Bcuz 4 srs Semicolon (talk) 14:01, 21 May 2012 (EDT)
 * I always am, why aren't you? :p – Emmett  22:18, 21 May 2012 (EDT)
 * Y U NO irc Semicolon (talk) 23:04, 21 May 2012 (EDT)

Yo
If you've got a minute. Admin dispute, bcrat time, etc.  Penguin  of  Death   17:44, 31 May 2012 (EDT)