Talk:Bowser (PM)

Separate PM Page for Giga Bowser
Say, if Giga Bowser can be playable permanently from the start of a match, shouldn't he also have a separate Project M page? Tell me if you agree or not. Requiem of Ice (talk) 17:40, 30 January 2014 (EST)

I think that's a good idea.
Since he has his own move set and abilities. As well as his own costumes. I think it would be a good idea to make a Project M page for him. And I could help. Queen Noob (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2014 (EST)
 * Afaik, his only moveset changes are the ones listed on the page, and they don't really warrant an article, plus there are alts like Dr. Mario that have different palette swaps. I don't think it's necessary. S c r 7 Scr7 sig.png(talk · contribs) 18:14, 30 January 2014 (EST)

Miscellaneous
Why isn't the music change from Brawl (as it's with other Mario characters) mentioned? I think it was implemented into v3.5? --MichaelxYoshi36 (talk) 18:52, 1 April 2015 (EDT)

Giga Bowser Heads?
If I recall correctly, Giga Bowser has his own stock icons (at least in 3.6). Shouldn't those be somewhere on here? (Wario-Man as well) ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe Nutta. 21:08, 27 June 2015 (EDT)

Bowser series symbol
Could someone replace the Mario series symbol with the Bowser one added in 3.6? I tried, but I couldn't find the coding. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe Nutta. 13:22, 4 July 2015 (EDT)

Create a separate Giga Bowser page.
As Giga Bowser can be selected from the start of a match, has their own moveset changes, etc., and plays vastly different compared to Bowser, I propose we split his section into its own article. --Darth Nightmaricus (talk) 23:50, 9 July 2015 (EDT)


 * Wouldn't it be better to make another moveset chart for Giga Bowser? Shadow (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2015 (EDT)

Side Smash Taunt?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjCKCeAN1OU Bowser's side taunt with biting hitboxes, is that actually a thing? I have trouble performing Smash Taunts... Shadow (talk) 02:33, 25 October 2015 (EDT)

Should we get rid of the "Revisions" sections?
I ask this because I feel some pages, in particular, are becoming or are at risk of becoming too long because of the "Revisions" sections. I feel that the "Changes from Melee/Brawl to Project M" section is sufficient enough to demonstrate changes. To me, it seems most of the "significant" info that comes with each version of Project M is covered in the "Changes from Melee/Brawl to Project M" anyway. Besides that, a lot of the "Revisions" stuff becomes outdated as new versions of Project M come out. On top of that, in my opinion, the "Revisions" stuff really isn't too interesting or helpful. Project M probably has all that info on their site. Does anyone agree with me?  John   PK SMAAAASH!!  18:22, 1 November 2015 (EST)