Talk:Buff

"characters"
I won't revert just yet, but I think in order for an entire CHARACTER to be buffed or nerfed, that would require a high degree of unbalance. Not only that, but some characters, like Peach, have had SOME moves buffed and OTHERS nerfed. Can someone help me with this??? - Gargomon251 20:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Pure speculation and some topics from Gfaqs and smashboards. Thats why I put considered in the title. Revert if you like, thats why we're here =] ItemHazard 20:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC) ItemHazard
 * I just didn't want to start an edit war. I will leave the SSB64→Melee data because I do feel the original was a bit unbalanced. - Gargomon251 20:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * smash 64 not balanced.....you kidding me right? Its way more balanced than melee or brawl besides Samus and Pikachu. On a related note, Fox is considered second best by most people now in smash 64. I'm changing him to minor User:KoRoBeNiKi

Attacks?
Why is buffing confined only to "attacks" buffed? There are other factors that can be buffed about a character such as weight, speed, recovery, size, traction, etc. Plus the article currently states in the intro "...From Melee to Brawl, Zelda is slightly quicker, Din's Fire was improved,..." The slightly quicker part has nothing to do with attacks. I think the buffed article (as well as the nerfed article while we're on the subject) should be changed to just "buffed", not "the strengthing of a veteran character's attacks" or "Characters who had attacks buffed..." Anyone else agree? Enigmatic Mr. L (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Split
Oppose This page shows buffs for every game, which in my opinion, is better than having a page that only shows buffs for one game. Bandit 11:11, 1 September 2012 (EDT)

Support When SSB4 comes out, this page will increase in size massively, and become quite unwieldy to read. Plus it would be better organised than one massive page listing every buff in every game. Omega  Tyrant   15:24, 1 September 2012 (EDT)

Support Per OT. Chuck Norris    17:04, 1 September 2012 (EDT)

Support As I pointed out in the Nerf discussion, SSB4 will double this article as it is. Mr.  Anon  talk  20:07, 1 September 2012 (EDT)

Support Why do we have to discuss this twice? Toast  ltimatum  20:08, 1 September 2012 (EDT)

Support Will be too massive.  Shu pa  Roeh   20:19, 1 September 2012 (EDT)

Support Per Omega and Anon.  James Heart  less  20:24, 1 September 2012 (EDT)

Support If the buffs were to be described in the same page, it won't be worth reading due to the gargantuan size. Smash Master   18:18, 16 September 2012 (EDT)

Support Per all the above points. -- Roy boy  X   Talk  18:19, 16 September 2012 (EDT)

Support Dots The Laser 18:21, 16 September 2012 (EDT)

This is a long page that's about to get even longer, so I support. Your average wiki user, Air   Conditioner   Keep cool! 18:23, 16 September 2012 (EDT)