Talk:Edge attack

Reverted change
I made an edit to clarify that exactly 100% damage results in slow edge attacks (in the games that have them). I added a citation needed tag because it was original research and might have been wrong. If the citation needed tag was unnecessary, just remove that. But instead, the whole edit was reverted. Wasn't that kind of detail that belongs on a Smash encyclopedia? P.i. (talk) 11:26, February 7, 2022 (EST)
 * At least 90% of the information on the wiki is original research, that isn't a reason for a citation. A bolder claim (such as saying something never spawns on a stage when that has never been the case) would need a citation/testing; something as simple as changing damage in Training is easily testable by anyone and a citation is pointless. Saying "exactly 100%" is a pointless because it is implied, we don't say Warlock Punch does exactly 30%, we just say it does 30%. I may have been a bit hasty with removing most of the edit and having "100% or more" or "at least 100%" would be fine to add back. --CanvasK (talk) 11:42, February 7, 2022 (EST)
 * I like your changes. Thank you! P.i. (talk) 13:10, February 7, 2022 (EST)