User talk:Mr. Anon/Archive 2

o_O
Yo, 98.117! Nice to see you made your own account now! Make a userpage and whatever, now you have a billion more rights than IPs a username! Hey, you want me to design a custom sig like mine for you?  --Havoc Reaper '48  23:01, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Mr. Anon (talk) 23:53, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * So Mr.Anon going to be your username name 98? Well happy birthday. Omega Tyrant [[Image: TyranitarMS.png | 25px]] 00:05, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Congrats!
You finally got rollback! Yesh! I have to say, you (technically) hold the record for lowest amount of contributions to receive rollback. Heh, I got mine at a bit past 100, I think. (Remember: Use rollback only if clearly vandalism). Again, congrats! --HavoC reaper '48 23:49, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Warning template
When you use the warning template, make sure to subset it, i.e. Crazy Hand. This allows it to sign your post as well as reads better when someone else edits the page. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 20:36, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

I hate to say this but...
You are not a mod. Please stop trying to act like one. And if you do, please read the policies that you are attempting to enforce and figure out if they actually apply to the situation. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 20:50, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have read the policy. I've been here for over 6 months, and I know them well. #6 on "What not to do" clearly states not to get into a debate with a vandal or a troll. Please stop acting like I'm a moron and that I know nothing about the policies. Mr. Anon (talk) 21:04, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Bridge of Eldin's fallout
I came across this page and I noticed that on the talk page you said you could provide videos of this glitch. Can you still provide a link to a video confirming this glitch? Omega  Tyrant   18:00, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0vCmWDLyrE. Mr. Anon teh awsome 18:11, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * While that video did show a zooming glitch I was not aware of, it did not show the glitch mentioned in the article. As such, is the article supposed to be about a different glitch or did you link me to the wrong video? Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 18:30, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Maybe I misread the article and thought that it refered to some of the glitches in that video. Mr. Anon teh awsome 18:34, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * So you can't provide a video of the glitch? Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 18:47, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Apparently, no. Sorry. Mr. Anon teh awsome 19:23, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I'll have to tag the page for deletion then. If I'm unable to do the glitch and no one brings up proof of it, I'll delete it. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 19:35, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Do you mean this one:It's over 9000!!! 04:16, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * In your signature you must make your username clear so that people will know who you are. As such, you must change your signature. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 04:24, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

How about now:Moon the Hedgehog is a WikiKnight! 10:33, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * The only links you can have in your sig are to your userpage, talk page, edit count, or contributions on this wiki. Other than that it's fine. Dr. Pain 99  [[File:dp99.png]]  Talk  14:57, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * The out-link in that signature is fine because he is an admin on the wiki it links to (I believe). Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:25, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, he's not. I checked. Mr. Anon teh awsome 02:28, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Would care to explain why you used rollback here? Omega  Tyrant   02:35, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * All of the user's edits seemed unncecessary. I was going to revert but then I realized that the user had made previous edits to the page. Sorry it didn't seem clear. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  04:36, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

1RV
One of the reasons your RfA failed is because of your lack of understanding of our policies. You aren't supposed to undo an undo. DP99 (CTE)  04:44, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Again, you are violating this policy. Please stop. DP99  (CTE) [[file:dp99.png]] 17:58, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I reverted your edit because you did not give a reason for it. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  18:01, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry I didn't give a reason, my iPod is really glitchy. But that doesn't matter, you still don't undo an undo. And we haven't discussed this about the skill levels, so for now they should be kept. DP99  (CTE) [[file:dp99.png]] 18:03, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * The thing is, there really isn't any opposition, so I assumed that there was no harm making the edits. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  18:09, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Another thing is, while I'm not saying that I shouldn't have reverted more than once, keep in mind that many previous users have done the same thing, and some of them are now admins. Also, it says in the policy not to revert people who break the rule, but bring it up on the talk page, which you yourself did. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  21:27, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I do not like the, "it's ok to break the rules because someone else did" mentality. That will not help to get me to support future RfAs. I know what the rule says, and I brought it up on your talk page and IRC before I reverted your revert. Plus I got permission from a Sysop (OT) to do so. DP99  (CTE) [[file:dp99.png]] 21:32, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I did not say that what I did was OK. I'm saying that it annoys me when you go like "You can't be an admin because you broke this one minor rule". I get it. I also agree that for now they should be kept until other users give their opinions. I don't want to break our friendship by arguing about this stuff. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  21:40, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm glad that you understand that what you did was wrong, that's all I wanted. And I'm not trying to say you can't be an admin because you broke this one minor rule; I'm only trying to say don't do a lot of stuff like this. I'm not trying to badger you, I'm only trying to help, and I understand that all users make mistakes.

I have two personalities, on SW, I'm serious and either emotionless or angry. My other personality I use on IRC, and that one is goofy and playful. What happens to one personality will not effect the other, so I will not break our friendship over these disputes. :) DP99  (CTE)  21:52, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry I got angry earlyier, and thanks for explaining. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  21:58, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I forgive you, and you're welcome. DP99  (CTE) [[file:dp99.png]] 22:00, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Smasher skill level
Why are you so convinced that skill level doesn't matter for smasher articles? Toomai Glittershine  eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  17:49, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well this is an encyclopedia, and adding skill levels is like adding an opinion, since they aren't measureable. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  17:50, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, but shouldn't you be discussing somewhere whether to remove them, instead of just removing them with little explanation? Toomai Glittershine [[Image:Toomai.png|20px]] eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  17:52, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well on the smasherbeta page I explained why I was removing it, and I thought there were policies that already explained this. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  17:53, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Smasherbeta isn't the best place for that, it's over here: SmashWiki:Smasher Project. I suggest you make a new section on that talk page before removing any more skill levels. Toomai Glittershine [[Image:Toomai.png|20px]] eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  17:56, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

D v. Delete
Please learn the difference between the tags; "d" let's an admin know that the page is spam and needs to be immediately removed from the mainspace, while "delete" let's him or her know that the deletion needs to be discussed and determined by consensus. That page was obviously spam, thus not meriting discussion over its removal.  BNK [ E 02:23, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Except the page wasn't spam. That template is only supposed to be used for vandalism. Please stop acting like I'm a moron. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  04:01, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Starmen.net
Dude, I saw what you wrote on BNK's user page, and I'll tell you who I am. In fact, you know who I am.

I am PKRok. Para Goomba 348 01:14, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

1
Admins don't settle content disputes; they only settle user disputes if it's necessary. Shadowcrest 21:33, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok then. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  23:45, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Eruption
A stage 8 Eruption is an OHKO on the majority of the cast and you are either testing it wrong or testing it in Training Mode. A stage 8 Eruption will do 39% with vertical knockback. If you were not in training mode and was failing to OHKO the enemy, you were either landing a stage 7 Eruption, a fully charged Eruption, or was testing it only on the few characters that can survive it at 0%. Now if you actually test this properly against those not listed that can survive it, you will clearly see that a stage 8 Eruption is in fact an OHKO. Omega  Tyrant   06:12, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

2
Could you explain why you attempted to rollback this message on the Aura Storm talk page when the message while lacking professional tone, still pertained to the content of the article? Omega  Tyrant   07:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * The message was spam, so I removed it. While generic comments are not to be removed, spam is, so I removed it. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  15:30, September 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * Even if a talk page edit is spam, you should still leave it for reference. Doctor Pain 99 ( C  T  E ) [[file:dp99.png]] 15:32, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Quoting Toomai:"Many users agree that no one should ever remove non-spam comments from talk pages (even your own), without exception. This is considered an unwritten rule by many." As there is no written rule about the not removing comments thing (as far as I know), I assumed that the above statement was the unwritten rule. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  15:37, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Did you actually read the message? The IP was asking if a piece trivia was necessary, which means the message pertained to the content of the article, which messages on talk pages are supposed to do. As I said in my last post, it was written in a non professional tone, but it still pertained to the content of the article, which means there was no reason for you to rollback it. It was certainly not spam. Omega   Tyrant  [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 15:40, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I must have misinterpreted it as spam. Sorry about that. Mr. Anon teh awsome  Anon  Sir Anon  the great  16:41, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I don't fault you for removing it. It looked a lot like a spam message to me as well.  But I think the general rule of thumb is if there is any content to the post beyond "buy cheap Viagra online" let it stay and just let an admin know about it.  Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 17:17, September 3, 2010 (UTC)