User talk:SnorlaxMonster: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→This) |
m (→This) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
...isn't really apparent vandalism per se. The person who edited this could have easily messed up their wording. Don't forget to assume good faith. [[User:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><span style="color: red;">SugarCookie</span></span>]] [[User talk:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color: green;">420</span></span>]] 10:57, April 7, 2019 (EDT) | ...isn't really apparent vandalism per se. The person who edited this could have easily messed up their wording. Don't forget to assume good faith. [[User:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><span style="color: red;">SugarCookie</span></span>]] [[User talk:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color: green;">420</span></span>]] 10:57, April 7, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:When the only change is to make something clearly false, it seems pretty clearly like vandalism to me. It's one thing if it looks like a typo that happened while making a constructive edit, but that was clearly a case where someone was deliberately inserting false information. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:00, April 7, 2019 (EDT) | :When the only change is to make something clearly false, it seems pretty clearly like vandalism to me. It's one thing if it looks like a typo that happened while making a constructive edit, but that was clearly a case where someone was deliberately inserting false information. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:00, April 7, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::Still, I see it as an honest mistake and less of actual vandalism. He may have misread the sentence or believed it worked better, but it is definitely not obvious vandalism. [[User:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><span style="color: red;">SugarCookie</span></span>]] [[User talk:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color: green;">420</span></span>]] 15:45, April 7, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:45, April 7, 2019
Hi there!
Welcome to our wiki, and thank you for your contributions! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.
- Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.
- Please sign in, if you haven't already, and create a user name! It's free, and it'll help you keep track of all your edits. See Help:Why create an account for more info on creating an account.
- Questions? You can ask at the Help desk or on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!
- Need help? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and pages to help you learn how to edit.
I'm really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you!
- SnorlaxMonster (talk) 23:04, 29 October 2010 (EDT)
This
...isn't really apparent vandalism per se. The person who edited this could have easily messed up their wording. Don't forget to assume good faith. SugarCookie 420 10:57, April 7, 2019 (EDT)
- When the only change is to make something clearly false, it seems pretty clearly like vandalism to me. It's one thing if it looks like a typo that happened while making a constructive edit, but that was clearly a case where someone was deliberately inserting false information. --SnorlaxMonster 11:00, April 7, 2019 (EDT)
- Still, I see it as an honest mistake and less of actual vandalism. He may have misread the sentence or believed it worked better, but it is definitely not obvious vandalism. SugarCookie 420 15:45, April 7, 2019 (EDT)
