User talk:TheNuttyOne/Archive 4

current talk page

Archives

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3

Progress

Feel free to edit this: http://www.ssbwiki.com/User:KirbysCrazyAppetite/Celestial_Valley KirbysCrazyAppetite (talk) 21:42, 28 January 2016 (EST)

I'm assuming you plan on making the page for Keeby? ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 21:57, 28 January 2016 (EST)

Soon, but i never completed his moveset, however, I have for other characters that aren't in SSBD. Yet. KirbysCrazyAppetite (talk) 22:04, 28 January 2016 (EST)

Awesome. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 22:06, 28 January 2016 (EST)

The picture is good for me, but the most complete moveset I actually remember is Chuih (from ChuChu Rocket): Neutral B: Roulette - Causes a random effect on a nearby target - 15 sec to recharge.

Side B: Reflector Arrow -Places an arrow and reflects a projectile for 1.5x damage. Can also flip running enemies.

Up B: Rocket Launch - Chuih launches into the air as he hangs from a rocket, explodes when he hits 2 fighters.

Down B - Asteroid Dash - Charge this up (4 sec) and Chuih will slam through anyone with a cold asteroid that's in his way, freezing fighters at around 40%. KirbysCrazyAppetite (talk) 22:29, 28 January 2016 (EST)

Your back KirbysCrazyAppetite (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2016 (EST)

What's up? ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:25, 1 February 2016 (EST)

Keeby's been changed to Dream Kirby (despite his name, Dream Kirby's not a major boss, though he could play a big role if the SSBD has a story mode) Dream Kirby is more of a "Celebrate Game Boy" character, kinda like Mr. Game & Watch, PAC-MAN, or ROB. I could explain to you where's he placed in All-Star and things like that. Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 06:39, 2 February 2016 (EST)

Uh where's the list for SSBD's all star mode? Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 20:55, 2 February 2016 (EST)

It's not technically a thing. Draco drafted it on User:DracoRexKing/Sandbox but you'd have to get his permission to add the character.

Also, Project Dream edits are supposed to be over until February 10th, soooo ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 21:02, 2 February 2016 (EST)

sooo that means D Kirby's gonna have to wait. Ok. Also what happens when we pass the release date April 1st- Wait a minute I know what's going on here Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 21:09, 2 February 2016 (EST)

Admin

Can you tell me how to make that page to become an admin?Swagman (talk) 16:59, 1 February 2016 (EST)

I suggest you read the page.

That said, I also suggest you don't apply for adminship. The community is not going to approve having an admin who's only been here for one day and helped the wiki very little. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 17:01, 1 February 2016 (EST)

What DNK means to say is with you being a new user, your odds of getting promoted are slim to none. I recommend waiting at least a year first and contribute to the mainspace some more before even considering submitting an application. Disaster Flare (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2016 (EST)

Not necessarily a year, but certainly until you've become a beneficial part of the community. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 17:04, 1 February 2016 (EST)

...You still didn't do it right... ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 17:09, 1 February 2016 (EST)

DatNuttyKid, and me pal Disaster Flare who helped make my signature, give me advise like what to edit. Like maybe a new combo or property, like a disjointed hitbox.Swagman (talk) 17:16, 1 February 2016 (EST)

I mean, the bar of stuff on Recent Changes all needs done. There are grammar errors everywhere. I have a few things listed on to-do list and so does Miles. There's plenty of stuff that needs done, you just have to find it. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 17:17, 1 February 2016 (EST)

I also have one Serpent King 19:48, 1 February 2016 (EST)

It's safe.

Serpent King 01:33, 2 February 2016 (EST)

Thought you said you wouldn't be up this late :P

Anyways, I sent you the image. Aidan, the Wandering Space Warrior 22:54, 2 February 2016 (EST)

Two things

1. I'm not 100% sure the update even is up; I'm just going off of what my friend on Facebook said (for the record, he's reliable). That being said, can you double check for me?
2. I responded to the image you sent me.

Aidan, the Wandering Space Warrior 10:34, 3 February 2016 (EST)

Well if it helps any, the update's not live on 3DS yet. Disaster Flare (talk) 10:36, 3 February 2016 (EST)

Odd. That's the opposite of what my friend said. (Then again, he did say that it was "just some sort of update", so...) Aidan, the Wandering Space Warrior 10:37, 3 February 2016 (EST)

I can't check because I'm working on school (technically I'm not supposed to be here). Soo... ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 10:39, 3 February 2016 (EST)

Nintendo of Europe said the update would be available on the morning of the 4th. That's still at least eight hours or so away. Zyrac(talk•contribs) 10:42, 3 February 2016 (EST)

Yea, my friend (different guy) sent something that said NoA said the network services would be unavailable from 4:50 PM - 6:50 PM Pacific time. Aidan, the Wandering Space Warrior 10:44, 3 February 2016 (EST)

Well, nothing says Europe is getting it at the exact same time as North America. But yeah, I'd say it's probably not out. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 10:44, 3 February 2016 (EST)

About CHawk's talk.

1. Year ago or not,doesn't matter. Still a personal attack. 2. I would consider that worthy enough to be somewhat of a vandal. I mean, he called him a ****. Penro ...that's all. 22:06, 5 February 2016 (EST)

I mean, by reverting an edit that was made over a year ago all you did was give Clarinet Hawk a notification he didn't need. The user hasn't been back since and seems to show no interest in ever coming back, and it wasn't causing a problem (the closest thing to a problem would be me reverting it, which wouldn't have happened if you hadn't removed it in the first place), so it's kind of just a pointless thing to do. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:01, 6 February 2016 (EST)

Regarding this

What say you and I tackle the other pages with it then, eh? Aidan, the Lovely Dragon Warrior 16:05, 9 February 2016 (EST)

Sure. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 16:07, 9 February 2016 (EST)

5 edits Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ 16:34, 9 February 2016 (EST)

you might want to go on IRC

We are having a debate on SSBD, i think you might want to come Poultry(talk) the fluffy 18:27, 9 February 2016 (EST)

Message from Aidan

He wants you to come here so we can discuss SSBD's future: [1] Disaster Flare (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2016 (EST)

Get on the wikia chat

Dots has a plan for us Aidan, the Lovely Dragon Warrior 21:51, 9 February 2016 (EST)

SW:1RV

Reminder: There is a policy in place that prohibits multiple reversions of the same edit. Please refrain from reverting or repeating an edit that has already been undone. Instead, bring the subject up on the article's associated talk page.

I know that in this case, I was the one who technically violated the policy first, but you proceeded to further violate it. I have frankly reached the end of my tolerance threshold with this. You have been warned multiple times, and yet you continue to do it with almost every issue that you are not going to come out successful on. It ends now, this is your official warning. Serpent King 19:36, 13 February 2016 (EST)

I don't believe this was a violation of it, as I presented my argument for why the tag should stay on the talk page and was then reverted yet again despite this policy.

I understand that I handle things like this improperly from time to time, but I do not believe this is the case. Maybe you should look back on your own actions. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 19:38, 13 February 2016 (EST)

This is literally the first time I have committed a breach of any policy, no matter how minor in months. I don't see your point. Serpent King 19:40, 13 February 2016 (EST)

I never said you had disobeyed any policies previously. I said that I presented a counter argument followed immediately by you breaking the policy for the second time in the situation. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 19:41, 13 February 2016 (EST)

There's also the fact that I've only majorly violated 1RV once before, which has already been dealt with and I have apologized for and let go. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 19:48, 13 February 2016 (EST)

There was Hammer (move) and the Toon Link art in recent memory. Serpent King 19:49, 13 February 2016 (EST)

Um, my only Toon Link art edit was after the argument had been resolved (and then once more when Ixbran made a misled revert to it, which he also undid at the same time) ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 19:51, 13 February 2016 (EST)

Oh ok fair enough, I see now. Serpent King 19:54, 13 February 2016 (EST)

So we're back to only one previous violation, and this violation that I'm still 99% sure isn't really a violation. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 19:56, 13 February 2016 (EST)

It's a violation, I wouldn't have called you out on it if it weren't. I am not trying to spite you by doing this, but I am starting to get frustrated that each time you appear on the losing side of an argument, any attempt to resolve it ends in an edit war. Serpent King 20:00, 13 February 2016 (EST)

Erm, I'm not on the losing side of that argument. I don't want PlatinumGames to get a page. But I wanted the discussion to actually be, y'know, discussed. I told you, I react to unfairness in the same way no matter which side of the argument I'm on.

And, while it is not written in the policy, undoing an undo after providing enough evidence is generally fine, and that is what I did. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:02, 13 February 2016 (EST)

So it's ok to break a policy as long as that's good with you? You tend to bend policies to your advantage a lot, I've noticed. Serpent King 20:05, 13 February 2016 (EST)

You tend to bend statements to your advantage a lot, I've noticed.

Reread my statement and tell me honestly that I said I can break policies when it benefits me. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:06, 13 February 2016 (EST)

• "And, while it is not written in the policy"- Admitted that it is a break
• "undoing an undo after providing enough evidence"- I saw 0 evidence in this case
• "generally fine, and that is what I did"- AKA it benefits you. Serpent King 20:10, 13 February 2016 (EST)

• It's also not written in the policy that you can't open a discussion the next day, yet you seem to enforce that pretty hard. It's not written in the policy that you can permaban an IP if they are a 5-time repeat offender, yet Miles did that.
• You saw 0 evidence that you agreed with. I saw 0 evidence that I agreed with when you added the tag back twice. But I did state why it should be okay, which in previous cases is appropriate.
• That... is a completely false and ridiculous-sounding "AKA". "generally fine" = whenever someone else does it, no one argues (digging through contributions to try to find examples). "that is what I did" = well, literally I did what I had seen happen in the past and be fine and figured it was fine here too. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:14, 13 February 2016 (EST)

Aha, here's] the example I was looking for. (It was later undone once better arguments were provided for the other side.) ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:15, 13 February 2016 (EST)

Actually, it isn't in policy that you aren't supposed to block IPs infinitely, that's just what happens in practice given that IPs change. Also, no, I literally saw 0 additional evidence, agreed upon or not, for your revert (unless you count "Countering your counter. (I wanted to link that Roy GIF but I can't find it.) PG developed it, just like Game Freak developed Pokemon" which was proven faulty.) What I was trying to say with the third point is that, by reverting, you get your way. This whole discussion was flawed at its core, I saw that and ended discussion, only to have it be brought up again with no additional evidence that could have backed the opposing side up. Serpent King 20:27, 13 February 2016 (EST)

..."IPs should never be infinitely blocked." isn't a thing then? And I'm referring to my response in the other section: "First of all, there's only three people who agree with not mainspacing it vs. two people who think it should be mainspaced, and one person who doesn't really care but thinks the decision on it should be the same as Game Freak, etc. (me). That's not consensus in any form of the word. Second of all, Penro has yet to see mine and Bacon's argument about Game Freak, which is a perfectly legitimate argument for it to be mainspaced. He should have the opportunity to change his opinion (or not) based on this new information." You disagreed with it and, instead of conversing, reverted it yet again, so I stopped the edit war to continue to discuss with my second response. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:31, 13 February 2016 (EST)

You're confusing evidence towards the matter at hand (keeping/deleting the page) with evidence towards continuing discussion. I am only concerned with new evidence if it pertains to the matter at hand. Since none was given, there exists no reason for discussion to continue. Serpent King 20:35, 13 February 2016 (EST)

We still only had a 3:2:1 with good arguments from either side - which, as a mostly neutral third party, I feel I have the more trustworthy opinion on, versus your regularly biased (as you have openly admitted) opinion. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:45, 13 February 2016 (EST)

Suggesting that your opinion matters more than mine is narcissistic. Also, 4 were in support for deletion (Myself, Miles, Penro, and Smashedpotatoes), not that the number matters much. It's all in weight of argument, and the opposing argument was proven ultimately false. Serpent King 20:50, 13 February 2016 (EST)

Not until after you forcefully ended the argument. Rather than present that evidence, you decided it better to ignore the opposing argument as irrelevant and end it anyway.

4:2:1 isn't much better, and Smashed was also only a half vote.

And also, the problem isn't whether or not the discussion was over, but whether or not me undoing your 1RV-violation was proper, so... ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:53, 13 February 2016 (EST)

My point wasn't that my opinion matters more than yours - rather, it was that it is a less biased opinion, given that you were on one of the sides and I was largely neutral. Deciding based on argument worth should not be done by someone involved in the argument. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:55, 13 February 2016 (EST)

You asked "why is this [trivia fact] back?"

http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Character_selection_screen&action=history

What are you talking about? It was never removed until you did it just now.

(psst don't forget to sign)

Seriously? Hm, I could've sworn there was an argument about it in the past... Maybe that was on MarioWiki...

Either way, it's pretty speculative. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by cupid♥. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 10:09, 20 February 2016 (EST)

Oh yea

I emailed you earlier. :P Aidan, the Lovely Dragon Warrior 22:33, 21 February 2016 (EST)

Your sig

I miss your old sig, "-preceding unsigned added by you, or maybe DatNuttyKid"... I think it was better than this one, because it always fooled me. Swagman, the Green Swordsman 07:50, 23 February 2016 (EST)

He sometimes changes it to match the holiday. (Speaking of which...) Aidan, the Lovely Dragon Warrior 08:30, 23 February 2016 (EST)

It's still the same sig, it just says cupid or turkey or Santa (or, soon, bunny) instead of "you". Also I'm 99% sure I changed it back. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 12:02, 23 February 2016 (EST)

Hi!

I have just been contacted by an admin of MarioWiki who gave me an IP that, when check-user'd, turned out to be you. Apparently, you have been violating their NPA policy and being generally unpleasant. Allow me to be quite clear: This stops now or there will be consequences. Serpent King 20:11, 6 March 2016 (EST)

Yeahhh sorry about that. Won't happen again. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 22:27, 6 March 2016 (EST)

What are you doing?

What are you doing with the: Preceding unsigned comment added by you or maybe DatNuttyKid. .And other seasonal jokes? The you, Cupid♥, Boo!, and A Turkey! those all redirect to me. I always sign my comments. TabuuandMasterCore the Pi day! (talk) 20:14, 14 March 2016 (EDT)