Talk:Edgehogging

Move proposal

Strong oppose. Can you stop with the pointless article renaming? A redirect with the proposed name already exists, why the heck do we need this? Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 19:12, 27 February 2018 (EST)

Articles are to be named by their primary topic, which means the term most commonly used for the phrase. In this case, I've seen "Edgehogging" spelled more commonly without a dash (SmashWiki is the only place I've ever seen it spelled with a dash). Just because a redirect exists does not mean this article needs to stay where it is; in many cases the redirect should actually be the correct title. Awesome Cardinal 2000 19:56, 27 February 2018 (EST)

Oppose. There is absolutely no point in renaming an article when the name works both ways and the page has a redirect with the name in question. St. Reggie, Leprachaun 23:42, 27 February 2018 (EST)

Except we use the more common and popular name as the main title, and if you look onto any sort of Smash-themed website, you'll see that everyone spells it without a dash. As I explained before, a redirect could in fact be the proper title for the page. Awesome Cardinal 2000 21:28, 28 February 2018 (EST)

But it's not necessary. St. Reggie, the Iron Leprachaun Warrior 21:49, 1 March 2018 (EST)

What's not necessary? Actually explain why you think it isn't, or maybe respond to something I said. If it really bothers you that I'm pushing for this page rename, then just don't comment on the talk page and ignore it. Awesome Cardinal 2000 00:33, 2 March 2018 (EST)