SmashWiki:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Current requests: User already passed his RfA.)
(40 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{template:policy}}
{{policy}}
{{shortcut|[[SW:RFA]]}}
{{shortcut|[[SW:RFA]]}}
This is the page for '''requesting [[SmashWiki:Administrators|adminship]]''' for SmashWiki.  
This is the page for '''requesting [[SmashWiki:Administrators|adminship]]''' for SmashWiki.  


==Rules & Regulations==
==Rules & Regulations==
* Only self-nominations are allowed. If you think that another member would make a good sysop, then you can convince them to nominate themselves. You cannot, however, make a nomination on behalf of another user.
* Only self-nominations are allowed. If you think that another member would make a good sysop, then you can convince them to nominate themselves. You cannot make a nomination on behalf of another user.
* After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.
* After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived.
* Selections of sysops are not a simple vote count, or majority opinion. Users who wish to be promoted should demonstrate a steady commitment to this wiki, and be able to point to reasons that the sysop tools would allow them to do better editing.
* Selections of sysops are not a simple vote count, or majority opinion. Users who wish to be promoted should demonstrate a steady commitment to this wiki, and be able to point to reasons that the sysop tools would allow them to do better editing.
* Candidates should describe why the wiki should want them to be sysops, not why they want to be sysops on the wiki.
* Candidates should describe why the wiki should want them to be sysops, not why they want to be sysops on the wiki.
* When supporting or opposing a candidate, give good reasons. Comments that describe in detail why the candidate should/should not become a sysop carry far more weight than simple support/oppose.  Also, support comments that reference only edit count carry almost no weight in the selection process.
* When supporting or opposing a candidate, give good reasons. Comments that describe in detail why the candidate should/should not become a sysop carry far more weight than simple support/oppose.
* Rollback status is not required for a successful RfA, but is highly encouraged. However, users who only want sysop tools for quick reverts of vandalism will be refused and directed towards the appropriate request.
* Rollback status is not required for a successful RfA, but is highly encouraged. Users who only want sysop tools for quick reverts of vandalism will be directed towards the appropriate request.
* Upon request, a prospective sysop may be given a scenario and asked his/her opinion on how s/he would handle it.
* Upon request, a prospective sysop may be given a scenario and asked his/her opinion on how s/he would handle it.
* If a user has been blocked for any reason (except an IP auto-block or a wrong button click), s/he must wait a period of at least four months from the expiry of his/her ban until s/he may even be considered for adminship. Even after this time period has passed, the user should be prepared to answer questions about his/her block.
* Users that have been blocked in the past, or who have previously made an RfA and failed, are no less eligible for adminship. However, such users should be able to demonstrate how they have improved since the block/previous RfA, lest their RfA find serious opposition.
* For users that have had previous unsuccessful RfAs and are planning to open a new one, consider the reasons that the previous nominations failed. Has anything changed about you that would make a new nomination successful?


==Past nominations==
==Past nominations==
*For a list of all previous requests for adminship, please see [[:Category:Resolved RfAs|this category]].
*For a list of all previous requests for adminship that ended with the candidate's promotion, please see [[:Category:Accepted RfAs|this category]].
**For a list of all previous requests for adminship that ended with the candidate's promotion, please see [[:Category:Accepted RfAs|this category]].
*For a list of all previous requests for adminship wherein the candidate was not promoted, please see [[:Category:Failed RfAs|this category]].
**For a list of all previous requests for adminship wherein the candidate was not promoted, please see [[:Category:Failed RfAs|this category]].


==How to nominate==
==How to nominate==
If you have not had a request for adminship page before, follow this 2 step process.
If you have not had a request for adminship page before, follow this two-step process.
 
#Go to the end of the [[#Current requests|requests]] section below, and add the following text:<br><code><nowiki>{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username}}</nowiki></code> Where "Username" is the name of the user being nominated.
#Go to the end of the [[#Current requests|requests]] section below, and add the following text:<br><code><nowiki>{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username}}</nowiki></code> Where "Username" is the name of the user being nominated.
#Click on the created red link, and add:<br><code><nowiki>{{subst:rfa|Username|reason for nomination}}</nowiki></code>
#Click on the created red link, and add:<br><code><nowiki>{{subst:rfa|Username|reason for nomination}}</nowiki></code>
Line 30: Line 29:


==Current requests==
==Current requests==
<br><code><nowiki>
''none''
{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username}}</nowiki></code>
 
[[Category:SmashWiki]]
[[Category:SmashWiki]]
[[Category:Administration]]
[[Category:Administration]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Requests for adminship}}

Revision as of 18:17, September 29, 2015

Policy.png This page documents an official SmashWiki policy, a widely accepted standard that all users should follow. When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. If in doubt, consider discussing changes on the talk page.
Shortcut:
SW:RFA

This is the page for requesting adminship for SmashWiki.

Rules & Regulations

  • Only self-nominations are allowed. If you think that another member would make a good sysop, then you can convince them to nominate themselves. You cannot make a nomination on behalf of another user.
  • After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived.
  • Selections of sysops are not a simple vote count, or majority opinion. Users who wish to be promoted should demonstrate a steady commitment to this wiki, and be able to point to reasons that the sysop tools would allow them to do better editing.
  • Candidates should describe why the wiki should want them to be sysops, not why they want to be sysops on the wiki.
  • When supporting or opposing a candidate, give good reasons. Comments that describe in detail why the candidate should/should not become a sysop carry far more weight than simple support/oppose.
  • Rollback status is not required for a successful RfA, but is highly encouraged. Users who only want sysop tools for quick reverts of vandalism will be directed towards the appropriate request.
  • Upon request, a prospective sysop may be given a scenario and asked his/her opinion on how s/he would handle it.
  • Users that have been blocked in the past, or who have previously made an RfA and failed, are no less eligible for adminship. However, such users should be able to demonstrate how they have improved since the block/previous RfA, lest their RfA find serious opposition.

Past nominations

  • For a list of all previous requests for adminship that ended with the candidate's promotion, please see this category.
  • For a list of all previous requests for adminship wherein the candidate was not promoted, please see this category.

How to nominate

If you have not had a request for adminship page before, follow this two-step process.

  1. Go to the end of the requests section below, and add the following text:
    {{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username}} Where "Username" is the name of the user being nominated.
  2. Click on the created red link, and add:
    {{subst:rfa|Username|reason for nomination}}

However, if you have had a previous request for adminship, follow this process instead.

  1. Go to the end of the requests section below, and add the following text:
    {{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username (#)}}
    Where "Username" is the name of the user being nominated, and where # is 2 for the second RfA, 3 for the third, and so on.
  2. Click on the created red link, and add:
    {{subst:rfa|Username|reason for nomination}}

Current requests

none