Category talk:Nintendo people

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Move to Category:Nintendo associates

Support

  1. YES. "Nintendo people" is almost comically vague. Nyargleblargle.pngNyargleblargle (Contribs) 21:39, 4 June 2017 (EDT)
  2. Support. I don't see why not, since asocciates sounds much more profesional. --BeepYouSignature.png Beep (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2017 (EDT)
  3. Support because formalities are nice. BaconMasterBaconMasterSig.png 21:43, 4 June 2017 (EDT)
  4. Support the name sounds so weird as-is ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 21:47, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

Oppose

  1. "Associates" implies things on the same tier as Nintendo itself, so I would assume companies from the phrase "Nintendo associates" and go in expecting to see Game Freak, Monolith Soft, etc. What's not clear or unprofessional about "people"? Miles (talk) 21:49, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

Neutral

  1. AidanzapunkSig1.pngAidan, the Wandering Dragon WarriorAidanzapunkSig2.png 21:47, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

Comments

I know I'm a new user, but I wanted to point out that Wikipedia also uses the category "Nintendo people". If it's good for Wikipedia, why wouldn't it be okay here? Queen Junko (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

Because we're not Wikipedia? AidanzapunkSig1.pngAidan, the Wandering Dragon WarriorAidanzapunkSig2.png 21:47, 4 June 2017 (EDT)
Whyyy do you guys ALWAYS point out what Wikipedia is doing? We don't mimic them. We are a completely different wiki with a completely different scope and a completely different userbase set to accomplish a completely different goal. There is no reason that we should follow suit with them. Serpent SKSig.png King 21:49, 4 June 2017 (EDT)