2,441
edits
Arcade controller: Difference between revisions
→Controversy: Link update
No edit summary |
(→Controversy: Link update) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
{{Trn|Royal Flush}} would invite Hax$ to compete using the B0XX, but Leffen would protest its use on the grounds of being a "modded controller", in which Royal Flush rescinded the invite. Hax$ would still attend the event to meet friends, where he would find out {{Sm|WatchingTime}} arranged to give Leffen a prototype arduino as part of a project to assist with legalising the B0XX for competitive play. Hax$ shook WatchingTime's shoulder in a panic and demanded for it to be returned to him. Leffen would find out about this and ask for the arduino, and Hax$ would decline before approaching Leffen with accusations of malfeasance. Upon the B0XX's official release, Leffen claimed there is no evidence of keyboard-style arcade controllers being better ergonomically, as well as cause to believe the B0XX could abuse cardinal 1.0, which Hax$ refuted. | {{Trn|Royal Flush}} would invite Hax$ to compete using the B0XX, but Leffen would protest its use on the grounds of being a "modded controller", in which Royal Flush rescinded the invite. Hax$ would still attend the event to meet friends, where he would find out {{Sm|WatchingTime}} arranged to give Leffen a prototype arduino as part of a project to assist with legalising the B0XX for competitive play. Hax$ shook WatchingTime's shoulder in a panic and demanded for it to be returned to him. Leffen would find out about this and ask for the arduino, and Hax$ would decline before approaching Leffen with accusations of malfeasance. Upon the B0XX's official release, Leffen claimed there is no evidence of keyboard-style arcade controllers being better ergonomically, as well as cause to believe the B0XX could abuse cardinal 1.0, which Hax$ refuted. | ||
As part of his [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= | As part of his [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeUf6S_b-_U "evidence.zip 2" video], Hax$ revealed information on {{Sm|Leffen}}'s role in its development. Hax$ accused Leffen of unfair bias against the B0XX, claiming that he engaged in a disinformation campaign aimed at hurting the controller's community and trying to unjustly ban the controller. Hax$ cited various YouTube videos where Leffen makes false claims, such as a notion that using the [[L button]] to [[L-cancel]] is optimal over the [[Z button]], whereas Hax$ argues that it's blatantly false and the Z button not locking the player out of [[tech]] during [[hitlag]] makes it superior. Leffen also made a unique button layout for the B0XX with his L-cancel preferences implemented among other perceived enhancements, which Hax$ also criticises as unergonomic and compares to "deleting System32" and that his "narcissism" made him find problems that didn't exist. Moderators from Hax$'s B0XX [[Discord]] server would attempt to argue their case with Leffen, though little would come of this. {{Sm|Pipsqueak}} would corroborate Leffen's opinion, in which Hax$ insulted them, calling them "Leffen's bitch", wherein Hax$ would receive criticism. [https://twitter.com/ssbmhax/status/1357482504496807940 Hax$ responded with an apology for his unprofessionalism] in the "button swap debate", which he later recanted in June as "damage control", and believes he did nothing wrong. Leffen responded to the video by expressing interest in contacting a lawyer<ref>https://twitter.com/TSM_Leffen/status/1401031413143642112?s=20</ref>, due to the other claims in the evidence.zip 2 video. | ||
==Frame1== | ==Frame1== | ||