Talk:List of rumors: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Removed redirect to Talk:List of rumors/Archive 6) Tag: Removed redirect |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive box|6}} | {{archive box|6}} | ||
==Cleanup== | |||
With this clean start, I'd like to bump the [[Forum:Major overhaul for "List of rumors"|cleanup project]] that got unanimous approval but no real progress. To recap: '''Rumors should only be listed once they are disproven''', '''rumors should be written about from an objective, neutral standpoint with emphasis on citations''', '''only the most notable rumors should be added.''' None of the Bigby Wolf or "Does not perform well in Autumn" nonsense. I'd like to get a discussion rolling on which entries are fit to take out, but I think it's a good time to move ahead with this. ~ [[User:Serena Strawberry|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Serena Strawberry'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Serena Strawberry|talk]]) 20:37, May 10, 2020 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:37, May 10, 2020
Cleanup
With this clean start, I'd like to bump the cleanup project that got unanimous approval but no real progress. To recap: Rumors should only be listed once they are disproven, rumors should be written about from an objective, neutral standpoint with emphasis on citations, only the most notable rumors should be added. None of the Bigby Wolf or "Does not perform well in Autumn" nonsense. I'd like to get a discussion rolling on which entries are fit to take out, but I think it's a good time to move ahead with this. ~ Serena Strawberry (talk) 20:37, May 10, 2020 (EDT)
