SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Thiefery4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

	This RfA was closed as failed.
	Reason:	Lack of experience, candidate is unqualified --Shadowcrest (Non-bureaucrat closure)

Thiefery4 (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)

Please direct all discussions to the talk page.

Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.

Hi, I'm Thiefery4. I am a n00b but if I am promoted to a sysop then I will be able to really help out hear!! Please support me!!!!!<font face="BernhardMod BT">[[User:Thiefery4|<font color="purple">The Thief</font></font>]]:Thiefery4|<small>^{<font color=red">I steal </font>}</small>]] (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Support

• ...

Oppose

• You're supposed to prove that you deserve adminship and then request it, not the other way around. --Shadowcrest 19:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• Joey, this is a critical fail. You've made a bare minimum number of edits to the main namespace, and those were saying "young link is the best mad top tier." or something similar.Smoreking^(T) _(c) 19:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• You only have two mainspace edits and most of your edits have been on user talk pages. Besides, its not a good idea to run for adminship when you are relatively new here. ClonedPickle 19:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• lolno - Per the two above me. Blue Ninjakoopa 19:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose. I'd explain my reasoning, but it'd be redundant to the above. Miles (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• You argue a pretty strong case...for why I shouldn't support you. No edits, no experiance, and a self-proclaimed noob. As if. Oppose. Gutripper^Speak 20:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose User cannot zpell. Also, I don't know who you are. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 20:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

• ...

---